Abstract

In recent years, considerable efforts have been made by cultural heritage institutions across the globe to digitise cultural heritage sites, artifacts, historical maps, etc. for digital preservation and online representation. On the other hand, ample research projects and studies have been published that demonstrate the great capabilities of web-geographic information systems (web-GIS) for the dissemination and online representation of cultural heritage data. However, cultural heritage data and the associated metadata produced by many cultural heritage institutions are heterogeneous. To make this heterogeneous data more interoperable and structured, an ever-growing number of cultural heritage institutions are adopting linked data principles. Although the cultural heritage domain has already started implementing linked open data concepts to the cultural heritage data, there are not many research articles that present an easy-to-implement, free, and open-source-based web-GIS architecture that integrates 3D digital cultural heritage models with cloud computing and linked open data. Furthermore, the integration of web-GIS technologies with 3D web-based visualisation and linked open data may offer new dimensions of interaction and exploration of digital cultural heritage. To demonstrate the high potential of integration of these technologies, this study presents a novel cloud architecture that attempts to enhance digital cultural heritage exploration by integrating 3D digital cultural heritage models with linked open data from DBpedia and GeoNames platforms using web-GIS technologies. More specifically, a digital interactive map, 3D digital cultural heritage models, and linked open data from DBpedia and GeoNames platforms were integrated into a cloud-based web-GIS architecture. Thus, the users of the architecture can easily interact with the digital map, visualise 3D digital cultural heritage models, and explore linked open data from GeoNames and DBpedia platforms, which offer additional information and context related to the selected cultural heritage site as well as external web resources. The architecture was validated by applying it to specific case studies of Australian cultural heritage and seeking expert feedback on the system, its benefits, and scope for improvement in the near future.

Highlights

  • IntroductionTangible cultural heritage (e.g., monuments, sites, artifacts, historical maps) is often exposed to a variety of natural disasters such as earthquakes and flooding, as well as human-made hazards such as fires or human negligence

  • Tangible cultural heritage is often exposed to a variety of natural disasters such as earthquakes and flooding, as well as human-made hazards such as fires or human negligence

  • The front-end interface of the architecture consists of three sections, as shown in map in the central part of the user interface has clickable markers that represent cultural heritage sites from different data sources—namely, DBpedia, local data with 3D models, and the GeoNames platform

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tangible cultural heritage (e.g., monuments, sites, artifacts, historical maps) is often exposed to a variety of natural disasters such as earthquakes and flooding, as well as human-made hazards such as fires or human negligence. Ample research projects and studies were published that demonstrate the high potential of web-geographic information systems (web-GIS) for the dissemination and online representation of cultural heritage data [4,5]. This high potential of web-GIS in the dissemination and online representation of cultural heritage data is mainly due to the fact that the data derived from monuments, sites, and artifacts often contain spatiotemporal information such as geolocation on the Earth and time references, two critical data qualities for any web-GIS system. Cultural heritage data and the associated metadata produced by cultural heritage institutions are heterogeneous in different file formats and languages, typically interconnected in content, and are distributed in different web services across cultural heritage institutions and even countries [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call