Abstract
On 18 September 2023, Ukraine initiated proceedings against Poland, Hungary and the Slovak Republic under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding. This came in response to bans on Ukrainian grain imports which the three EU Member States had previously introduced. This unilateral conduct puts the common nature of the EU’s commercial policy, an exclusive Union competence, seriously into question. This article elaborates on that jeopardization of the common commercial policy by showing that the grain ban is violating WTO law and may result in retaliations affecting the EU at large. It then assesses whether nevertheless the commonality of the Union’s policy can be maintained both externally and internally. To this end, it elaborates on the practice of the Union in WTO dispute settlement and argues that the conduct of Member State organs is attributable to the EU. Furthermore, it analyses whether and on what basis infringement proceedings against the Member States may be successful. In this, it takes account of norms regarding the common commercial policy, the duty of cooperation, and the WTO Agreements as integral parts of EU law. To this end, special attention is paid to the CJEU’s jurisprudence on the legal value of WTO law and DSB Reports.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.