Abstract

In cities with serious air pollution, travel time and health damage significantly affect route choice by travelers (e.g., motorcycle and scooter drivers). Consequently, the classical Braess paradox is no longer realistic because it only considers the traveler’s value of time (VOT). In the current study, we describe a new transportation network paradox that considers both the VOT and the traveler’s perception of pollution damage. To examine the conditions that create the new paradox, we developed a novel method to compute a total comprehensive cost that combines the VOT with health damage. We analyzed the conditions for the new paradox and the system’s performance using a user equilibrium model and system optimization. Furthermore, an improved model is used to analyze how different transport modes influence the Braess paradox. We found that whether the new paradox occurs and the potential improvement of the system’s performance depend on whether the total travel demand falls within critical ranges. The bounds of these ranges depend on the values of the parameters in the function that describes the health damage and the link travel time function. In addition, high health damage significantly affects route choices and traffic flow distribution. This paper presents a new perspective for decision-making by transportation planners and for route choices in cities with serious air pollution.

Highlights

  • Air pollution has become an important topic in global environmental issues with economic development

  • We extended the traditional analysis, which only accounts for the value of time (VOT), to account for the effects of health damage on route choice

  • We identified the range of travel demands under which the new paradox occurred under user equilibrium (UE) conditions and determined whether the system’s performance could be improved under system optimization (SO) conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Air pollution has become an important topic in global environmental issues with economic development. A large number of greenhouse gases and pollutants are produced in the production, logistics, and other aspects of national economies. Large amounts of coal, coke, gasoline, diesel, and natural gas are consumed in manufacturing for the ferrous metal industry and nonferrous metal industries; CO2 emissions are continuing to grow [1]. As emissions produced by oceangoing vessels and container handling equipment would lead to drastic climate changes, ship operators have to constantly adjust the speed and route to reduce air pollution [2,3]. The aviation industry is in a similar condition. According to the Air Transportation Action Group (ATAG), the global aviation industry produced about 705 million tons of CO2 in 2013, which is about 2% of the total CO2 emissions and 13% of the total transportation-related emissions [4]

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call