Abstract
For the quagmire of Iraq, the three-state solution is a good one right now, and always has been the best choice. To recognize this inevitability, however, requires that the Bush Administration and its critics alike have an enduring and cohesive explanation for the emergence of the violent instability we see in Iraq. This essay suggests, first, a way to combine the basic elements of the three main streams of international relations in order to understand how individuals and groups may come to find violence acceptable and destroy civil society. Second, this theory of action helps explain why the circumstances particular to Iraq dictate a three-state future as the most powerful way to disrupt the underlying circumstances which fuel violence in Iraq.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
