Abstract

This essay aims to reignite the debate over the allocation of revenue from the Fee for Control, Monitoring, and Supervision of Mineral Research, Mining, Exploration, and Exploitation Activities (TFRM), established by Pará State Law nº 7,591/2011. The primary focus is on the flexibility of using TFRM revenue beyond its original purpose. The discussion emphasizes the challenges excessive revenue earmarking presents for public management and references Brazilian case law, highlighting the non-mandatory nature of such linkages, except in cases explicitly defined by law, like judicial fees. Although the Brazilian Constitution prohibits earmarking tax revenue, it does not impose the same restriction on fees unless specifically legislated. Drawing on Supreme Court decisions, this analysis questions the automatic presumption that fee revenue must fund the specific public services that justify their collection.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.