Abstract

Capacity and resilience are two closely aligned concepts in human development. They both contribute to increasing the ability of societies to cope with and adapt to challenging and adverse perturbations that may affect systems the societies depend upon. A traditional approach to building capacity and resilience at the community scale is to address in a fragmented manner specific issues at play in institutional, socio-economic, environmental, and infrastructure systems that may prevent the delivery of adequate community services and meeting development goals. This compartmentalized approach, driven by a need to reach some form of satisfactory community equilibrium, fails to recognize the interactions and interconnectedness that exist among community systems, which, if addressed, could solve multiple issues more effectively. It also does not account for the complex, adaptive, and dynamic nature of communities. A resilient community is more than just a collection of well-functioning silos. This paper proposes a system dynamics approach to account for the dynamic and adaptive nature of communities when developing capacity-building strategies toward strengthening their ability to deliver services and deal with adverse events. A case study of small-scale community capacity assessment around the service of wastewater and sewage treatment published elsewhere is presented to illustrate the proposed approach.

Highlights

  • The year 2020 is likely to be remembered in future history books as a critical year in human and economic development

  • Even though there is no one-size-fits-all approach to capacity building that would work for all community landscapes, capacity building represents a strategic means to an end, which is to create sustainable, peaceful, and resilient communities

  • A limitation of the UVC framework presented above is that it does not account for any interdependency that may exist among the different categories of capacity necessary to provide a specific service at the community level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The year 2020 is likely to be remembered in future history books as a critical year in human and economic development. A traditional approach to building capacity and resilience at the community scale is to identify and address in a fragmented manner specific issues at play in institutional, economic, social, environmental, and infrastructure systems that may prevent the delivery of community services and meeting development goals. This compartmentalized approach, driven by a need to reach some form of satisfactory community equilibrium, fails to recognize the interconnectedness among community systems, which, if addressed, could solve multiple issues more effectively. A case study of small-scale community (village size) capacity assessment around the service of wastewater and sewage treatment published elsewhere [15] is presented to illustrate the proposed approach

Definitions of Capacity
Capacity Building
Capacity Assessment
Mapping Capacity
Modeling Capacity Interdependency
Cross-Impact Analysis
Value-directed network showing how allallseven
Variation of the capacity assuming capacity dependency and an
Additional Analysis capacity matrix of Table
Variation of community capacity andcommunity community capacity
Multi-Service Approach
14. Variation
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call