Abstract

DNA damage activates Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) to halt cell cycle progression thereby preventing further DNA replication and mitosis until the damage has been repaired. Consequently, Chk1 inhibitors have emerged as promising anticancer therapeutics in combination with DNA damaging drugs, but their single agent activity also provides a novel approach that may be particularly effective in a subset of patients. From analysis of a large panel of cell lines, we demonstrate that 15% are very sensitive to the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776. Upon inhibition of Chk1, sensitive cells rapidly accumulate DNA double-strand breaks in S phase in a CDK2- and cyclin A-dependent manner. In contrast, resistant cells can continue to grow for at least 7 days despite continued inhibition of Chk1. Resistance can be circumvented by inhibiting Wee1 kinase and thereby directly activating CDK2. Hence, sensitivity to Chk1 inhibition is regulated upstream of CDK2 and correlates with accumulation of CDC25A. We conclude that cells poorly tolerate CDK2 activity in S phase and that a major function of Chk1 is to ensure it remains inactive. Indeed, inhibitors of CDK1 and CDK2 arrest cells in G1 or G2, respectively, but do not prevent progression through S phase demonstrating that neither kinase is required for S phase progression. Inappropriate activation of CDK2 in S phase underlies the sensitivity of a subset of cell lines to Chk1 inhibitors, and this may provide a novel therapeutic opportunity for appropriately stratified patients.

Highlights

  • In an undamaged cell, progression through G1, S and G2 phase of the cell cycle is dependent on temporal activation of cyclin-dependent kinases CDK1 and CDK2 in complex with cyclins E, A and B

  • The results suggest that only a subset of cell lines activate CDK2 in S phase upon incubation with a Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibitor, and that this might provide a chemical synthetic lethal interaction whereby a subset of tumors will respond to Chk1 inhibitors as monotherapy

  • We recently demonstrated that several cell lines are acutely sensitive to the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776 as a single agent [3, 4, 11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Progression through G1, S and G2 phase of the cell cycle is dependent on temporal activation of cyclin-dependent kinases CDK1 and CDK2 in complex with cyclins E, A and B. Chk inhibitors have been developed as potential adjuvants to DNA damaging agents as they circumvent arrest before repair is complete, drive cells through the cell cycle, and increase cell killing [2] Antimetabolites such as gemcitabine and hydroxyurea deprive cells of deoxyribonucleotides thereby stalling replication. Whether either of these approaches can elicit cytotoxicity that is selective for the tumor cells remains to be established, growth suppression in tumor xenografts suggests www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget these approaches are tolerated [4, 7] Both Chk and Wee inhibitors have been shown to have single agent activity in some cell lines, while the combination of these inhibitors has been reported to induce synergistic killing [3, 8,9,10]. This necessitated a critical reanalysis of the methods that discriminate CDK1 from CDK2

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call