Abstract
The government of the Republic of Korea has recently released a new administrative paradigm called “Government 3.0” to encourage the use of public data. Although this has caused a consistent increase in public data’s usage, users and managers still experience difficulties in the system because of management issues such as disordered naming, unstandardized classification, and the unprofessionalism and insufficient knowledge of on-site operators. To respond to these problems, this study focused on identifying the critical issues and points for improvement of public data management with case studies and focus group interviews with on-site persons in charge of public data belonging to Busan’s city government.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
