Abstract
This study aims to examine the problems of the DME (Disaster Management Evaluation) System, which has been implemented since 2005, using meta evaluation; it also aims topropose improvements. For this purpose, the research model was built on the four standards (propriety, utility, feasibility, accuracy) presented in the PUFA meta evaluation model. Checklist items corresponding to the PUFA model sub-components were then selected, and questionnaires were created using a Likert-style5-point scale for disaster assessment evaluators, central departments, local governments, and public institutions. Some of the results of thePUFA sub-components were statistically significant and proved to be a useful meta-evaluation framework for assessing the DME level. For evaluation performance, DME can only be improved if policy efforts to ensure the expertise of the evaluation department, credibility of the evaluator, and justification for the evaluation results are continued. From an evaluation indicators perspective, there is need for improvement ofthe capability-performance multi-dimensional evaluation system so that it can take into account the unique enforcement functions and regional characteristics of the evaluation target organization.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call