Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Physical examination ndings, vital signs, and laboratory results are other parameters used to estimate the intravascular volume status. These parameters are not reliable because they are inuenced by various clinical conditions.Some of these parameters may be found normal as the compensatory mechanisms of the body initiate; thus, this may result in delays in the detection of volume loss. The study was conducted in 50 patients and 50 control METHODOLOGY: s who visited the Emergency Department. Diameter of the IVC in expiration was lesser in the pre-uid re RESULTS: suscitation with a mean of 1.15 compared to the 1.52 in the post-uid resuscitation group. dIVCi – diameter of the IVC in inspiration was lesser in the pre-uid resuscitation with a mean of 0.81 compared to the 1.81 in the post-uid resuscitation group. IVC CI – IVC caval index was CONCLUSION: more in the pre-uid resuscitation with a mean of 33.42 compared to the 16.74 in the post-uid resuscitation group. dRV – diameter of the right ventricle was lesser in the pre-uid resuscitation with a mean of 2.80 compared to the 3.14 in the post-uid resuscitation group.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have