Abstract

This paper is devoted to providing a simple condition, in term of spectral theory, that characterizes existence/nonexistence and uniqueness of positive bounded solution to $$\begin{aligned} \nabla \cdot [n(y)\nabla u(x,y)] +\alpha (y)\partial _x u+\beta (y)\cdot \nabla _y u+f(x,y,u)=0 \quad (x,y)\in \mathbb {R}\times \mathbb {R}^{N-1},\qquad \end{aligned}$$ (0.1) where f is of monostable KPP type nonlinearity and periodic in y. Our contribution answers a conjecture raised by Prof. H. Berestycki: which suitable assumption can impose at infinity that characterizes existence/nonexistence and uniqueness of (0.1) instead of the followings \(\liminf _{|z|\rightarrow \infty }\partial _u f(z,0)>0\) as in Berestycki et al. (Ann Mat Pura Appl 186(4):469–507, 2007) and \(\limsup _{|z|\rightarrow \infty }\partial _u f(z,0)<0\) as in Berestycki et al. (Bull Math Biol 71:399, 2008) and Berestycki and Rossi (Discret Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 21:41–67, 2008) but allow \(\partial _u f(z,0)\) to change sign all the way as \(|z|\rightarrow \infty \)? Our result is simply based on maximum principle and complements to those in Berestycki et al. (Ann Mat Pura Appl 186:469–507, 2007; Bull Math Biol 71:399, 2008), Berestycki and Rossi (Discret Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 21:41–67, 2008) and Vo (J Differ Equ 259:4947–4988, 2015).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call