Abstract

Simple SummaryIn modern piggeries, due to the increase in litter size (number of piglets born alive), the number of piglets born at a low birth weight (typically under 1.0 kg) is increasing. Those piglets have a lower chance of survival because of their lower body energy reserves, and therefore are of concern for the farmers. Piglets weighing less than 1.1 kg at birth were given an oral dose of fat-based energy (2 mL of coconut oil or 2 mL of a commercial product), 2 mL of water or were only handled but given nothing. This was done to investigate the effects of providing an energy boost at birth on the chances of survival of small piglets. Parameters measured to assess the piglets’ vitality were survival, blood glucose content, rectal temperature, behaviour test of vigour and weight gain. Unfortunately, there was no effect of the energy dose on the parameters measured. Therefore, we conclude that a single dose of energy at birth does not enhance the chances of survival of small piglets. Therefore, using energy product to improve piglet survival at birth may not be the most efficient strategy.Low birth weight piglets are at high risk of mortality, because of the rapid depletion of their energy reserves after birth. At 3 h postpartum, 405 piglets weighing <1.1 kg were either dosed orally with 2 mL of (1) coconut oil (CO, 74 kJ/2 mL, n = 107 piglets), (2) commercial product (CP, 71 kJ/2 mL, n = 101 piglets), (3) water (W, 0 kJ/2 mL, n = 100 piglets) or (4) were sham-dosed (S, n = 97 piglets). Treatments were applied within litter (97 sows). Before treatment piglets were weighed, scored for vitality and blood glucose concentration (subset: CO = 45 piglets, CP = 38 piglets, W = 49 piglets and S = 44 piglets) and rectal temperature were measured. Rectal temperature was remeasured 1 h post-treatment (4 h postpartum). At 24 h post-treatment (27 h postpartum), vitality, weight and blood glucose were remeasured. Piglets were weighed on D5, D7, D10, D14, D21 and at weaning (27 ± 0.1 day old). Mortality rate and cause were recorded until 24h period post-treatment and until weaning. Data were analysed using Generalised Linear Mixed Models in SAS. There was no overall effect of treatment on any of the parameters measured. In conclusion, a single oral of fat-based energy supplement dose at birth did not improve growth, survival, rectal temperature or vitality of low birth weight piglets.

Highlights

  • Piglets are born immunologically naive and with low energy reserves

  • Lipid reserves of neonatal piglets seems to be influenced by their birth weight, which reduces the available energy obtained from fat from 175 kJ/kg of body weight to 19.5 kJ/kg of body weight (intra-uterine growth retardation (IUGR) piglets) [1], whereas glycogen reserves are not (252 kJ/kg of body weight for all piglets [1])

  • Piglets that received a dose of water tended to have a higher incidence of crushing compared to piglets that received a dose of coconut oil

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Piglets are born immunologically naive and with low energy reserves. Neonatal piglets mainly use body reserves of lipids, and carbohydrates as sources of energy for the production of heat; depletion of fat reserves increases carbohydrates reserves’ consumption rate [1]. The only exogenous source of energy for neonatal piglets is colostrum. Since colostrum yield does not increase with increased litter size [3], competition for its acquisition is intense in large litters. This important exogenous energy resource can be monopolised by the early-born and the most vigorous piglets

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call