Abstract
This paper shows that, viewed in a generalized “two-hop” framework for node failure recovery, p-cycles actually have a very high inherent ability to restore paths transiting through a failed node. We also showed that with relatively little, if any, extra spare capacity, the principle is also amenable to explicit design of networks for 100% node and span failure protection with a single efficient set of p-cycles that support both functions. This is very different than the often-prevailing assumption that “ordinary” p-cycles offer no node protection, or only the same node-protection as a BLSR ring embodies. Indeed, the two-hop paradigm for recovery of affected paths transiting failed nodes could provide an attractive option for future network operators in that “ordinary” p-cycles are more localized, fast acting, and simple to plan and operate than any other option such as NEPCs, flow-protecting p-cycles or FIPPs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.