Abstract
The use of iodinated contrast-enhancing agents in computed tomography (CT) improves the visualization of relevant structures for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). However, it can lead to dose calculation errors by incorrectly converting a CT number to electron density. This study aimed to propose an algorithm for deriving virtual non-contrast (VNC) electron density from dual-energy CT (DECT) data. This algorithm was developed by extending the formula previously developed by Saito, which enables the calculation of the electron density of human tissue through weighted subtraction of CT numbers acquired from DECT scans. To investigate the feasibility of the proposed VNC algorithm, we performed analytical DECT image simulations at 90 and 150kV/Sn on virtual phantoms consisting of various tissue/iodine surrogates with known mass densities and elemental compositions. Two different shapes of phantoms made of water-mimicking surrogates were generated as inputs: a circular phantom (33cm diameter) for calibration and an elliptical phantom (33cm width and 28cm height) for validation. The circular phantom was equipped with inserts of human-tissue-mimicking substitutes, pure water, and iodine-enhanced soft-tissue substitutes (2, 5, 10, and 15mg/mL iodine). The elliptical phantom contained inserts of reference human tissues, iodine-enhanced soft-tissue substitutes (2, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20mg/mL iodine), and a 10-mm-diameter core of 4mg/mL iodine surrounded by a blood-mimicking base material. The performance of the proposed algorithm was evaluated by comparing the accuracy of VNC electron densities with those of non-contrast (NC) base materials (water- or blood-mimicking surrogates). The derived algorithm enabled the calculation of VNC electron density in a manner similar to that of unenhanced human tissues by adapting a VNC-specific weighting factor, thereby eliminating the intermediate step of converting CT numbers to electron density. The simulated results showed that the VNC algorithm could almost completely remove the contrast in the electron density image between iodine-enhanced and base materials. The relative deviations of simulated VNC electron density values from the corresponding pre-contrast value were within±0.4% for all tested materials, with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.2%. Within the limits of the analytical DECT image simulation used in this study, the simple VNC algorithm could effectively provide accurate VNC electron densities for iodine-enhanced materials. This may allow the contrast agent to be used for CT scans during RTP without compromising dose calculation accuracy.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call