A simple action treshold for timing applications of a granulosis virus to controlPieris rapae [Lep.: Pieridae

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Pieris rapae (L.) an important pest of cole crops in the northeastern United States, is susceptible to a granulosis virus,Pieris rapae GV (PrGV), that has been shown to be an effective control measure by researchers in several countries. As an alternative to weekly applications of virus to protect cabbage, we tested the use of an action threshold of one small (first-third instar) larva per plant. Results were compared with those obtained using the same threshold with permethrin, and with weekly applications of virus. Plots treated weekly with virus received 5 applications but the action threshold was exceeded only once. In all virus-treated plots, numbers of large (fourth-fifth instar) larvae remained below 0.35 per plant, and were lower at the end of the season (0.07 in plots treated weekly and 0.1 in plots treated once) than in either the untreated or permethrin-treated plots (0.5). In late August, numbers of large larvae in the check plots reached almost 3 per plant. At harvest the number of feeding holes over 0.3 cm in diameter in the 4 innermost frame and the 4 wrapper leaves were counted. Check plots differed from treated plots by an average of 124.2±6.5 holes per plant in the frame and wrapper leave; virus-treated plots had 51.1±6.9 holes more than the permethrin plots. The difference in overall damage between plots treated 5 times with virus during the season and those treated once was not significant. Plots treated once with virus had significantly more damage (7.6±2.7) to wrapper leaves than those treated five times and marketability ratings were somewhat lower, based on fresh market standards. There were no significant differences in head weight among the treatments. At harvest, a high proportion of larvae collected from the check plots were diseased (77% versus an average of 46% in the treated plots). Because of the high numbers of large larvae in the check plots in late August and the extensive damage to plants, we assumed that virus did not affect a significant number of larvae in these plots until late in the growing season. These results indicate the usefulness of PrGV in a cabbage IPM program and that the use of action thresholds can be highly effective, particularly when insect numbers only occasionally reach damaging levels. While cabbage treated with permethrin had the least amount of injury, that treated weekly with virus was not significantly different by fresh market standards, and all cabbages treated with virus met processing standards. For the fresh market, in which cosmetic standards are more important, PrGV may have to be used weekly or with an action threshold lower than one small larva per plant.