Abstract
Although it has long been accepted that the medieval English parliament was very much the ‘king's parliament’, little attention has been devoted to the king's presence in the assembly and its significance. Edward II and Edward III allowed parliament to meet without them on several occasions. With the political community reacting against increasingly frequent royal absences by the early thirteen-forties, Edward III and his successors were forced to accept the importance of working personally with parliament. The manner in which the king handled this presence, in particular the use of the royal speech, was indicative of his management of the political community as a whole and the success (or otherwise) of his kingship.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
