Abstract

Mathematical models are used for simulating the electrochemical phenomena of proton-exchange-membrane (PEM) fuel cells. They differ in the scale, modeling variables, precision in specific features, and the required parameters. Often, the input parameters are not measurable and need to be estimated by minimizing the error between the model output and experimental data; however, the estimated parameters could differ from one model to another, hence provoking uncertainty about the correct values and the model’s suitability for simulating the real phenomenon. To address these issues, we introduced a self-validating methodology using three different mathematical models: The first set of parameters was estimated with a semi-empirical (SE) model; then, it was used for computing several points of the polarization curve (PC). The SE parameters and points were used to estimate a second set of parameters and to compute a single point of the PC with a macro-homogeneous (MH) model. The parameters and concentration profiles from the MH solution were used to estimate the last set of parameters with the reaction–convection–diffusion (SP-RCD) model, increasing the detail of the simulation. The SP-RCD parameters were returned to the MH model to recover the complete PC. The proposed methodology requires a few data points to consistently recover the same PC from the three models through estimating parameters in one model and validating them in the others. As output, the method provides complete information about several variables and the physical properties of the catalysts. In addition to the consistent simulation, the numerical results are consistent with those reported in the literature, thus validating the proposed method.

Highlights

  • Since the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century, the generation of alternative clean technologies has been increasing to counteract the increase in pollutants and energy consumption due to the increasing global population [1]

  • We describe the three mathematical models used: semi-empirical, macro-homogeneous, and set of parameters with the reaction–convection–diffusion (SP-RCD) models; each of them requires a different set of parameters but shares some of them, and each delivers different kinds of solutions that, according to the methodology introduced in this work, are interrelated for the consistent simulation of the PEMFC and the consistent estimation of parameters

  • The macro-homogeneous model describes the missing characteristics that the semiempiric model is unable to describe; we propose to use a part of the polarization curve simulated by the semi-empiric model, close to the activation losses region, to sample a set of points, called SSE, which was used to estimate a second set of parameters ~θ MH from the macro-homogeneous model

Read more

Summary

A Self-Validating Method via the Unification of Multiple

CONACYT-Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de Información Geoespacial, CENTROGEO, A.C., Parque.

Introduction
Mathematical Models for PEMFC
Semi-Empirical Model
Macro-Homogeneous Model
SP-RCD Model
Parameter Estimation Problem
Self-Validating Methodology
Results
Dataset 1
Dataset 2
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call