A risk classification system predicting the cancer-specific survival for postoperative stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer patients without lymphovascular and visceral pleural invasion

Abstract

BackgroundThis study aims to formulate a risk classification system predicting the cancer-specific survival (CSS) for postoperative stage IB NSCLC patients without lymphovascular (LVI) and visceral pleural (VPI) invasion to guide treatment decision making and assist patient counseling. MethodA total of 4,238 patients were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts (7:3). The risk factors were identified by Cox regression. Concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and Decision Curve Analyses (DCAs) were used to evaluate the performance of nomogram. We applied X-tile to calculate the optimal cut-off points and develop a risk classification system. The Kaplan-Meier method was conducted to evaluate CSS in different risk groups, and the significance was evaluated by log-rank test. ResultAmong the 4,238 patients, 1,014(23.9%) suffered cancer-specific death. In the training cohort, univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that age, gender, pathological subtype, grade, tumor size, the number of removed lymph nodes and surgical type were significantly associated with CSS. According to these results, the nomogram was formulated. The C-index of the prediction model was 0.755 in the training cohort (95%CI: 0.733–0.777) and 0.726 (95%CI: 0.695–0.757) in the validation cohort. The calibration curves in training and validation cohort exhibited good agreement between the predictions and actual observations. The Decision Curve Analyses (DCAs) showed net benefit can be achieved for nomogram. A risk classification system was further constructed that could perfectly classify patients into three risk groups. ConclusionIn this study, we constructed a nomogram to support individualized evaluation of CSS and a risk classification system to identify patients in the different risk groups in stage IB NSCLC patients without LVI and VPI. These tools could be useful in guiding treatment decision making and assisting patient counseling.