Abstract

Microfluidic devices have attracted increasing attention in the fields of biomedical diagnostics, food safety control, environmental protection, and animal epidemic prevention. Micromixing has a considerable impact on the efficiency and sensitivity of microfluidic devices. This work reviews recent advances on the passive and active micromixers for the development of various microfluidic chips. Recently reported active micromixers driven by pressure fields, electrical fields, sound fields, magnetic fields, and thermal fields, etc. and passive micromixers, which owned two-dimensional obstacles, unbalanced collisions, spiral and convergence-divergence structures or three-dimensional lamination and spiral structures, were summarized and discussed. The future trends for micromixers to combine with 3D printing and paper channel were brought forth as well.

Highlights

  • In the past decade, various microfluidic or lab-on-a-chip [1] devices have been attempted the analysis of biological and chemical targets in the fields of biomedical diagnostics, food safety control, environmental protection, and animal epidemic prevention, etc., and have received increasing attention due to their compact size, automatic operation, faster detection, less reagent, higher sensitivity and in-field use

  • 1 Mixing Index calculated based on Equation (1). 2 Mixing Index calculated based on Equation (2). 3 Mixing Index calculated based on Equation (3). 4 Mixing Index calculated based on Equation (4)

  • Compared with conventional macro-scale mixers, both passive and active micromixers have demonstrated their features of faster mixing, easier fabrication, higher efficiency, and lower cost

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Various microfluidic or lab-on-a-chip [1] devices have been attempted the analysis of biological and chemical targets in the fields of biomedical diagnostics, food safety control, environmental protection, and animal epidemic prevention, etc., and have received increasing attention due to their compact size, automatic operation, faster detection, less reagent, higher sensitivity and in-field use They can generally integrate injection, mixing, reaction, washing, separation and detection onto a centimeter-level chip [2]. An improved mixing index [4] based on the comparison of the standard deviation to the mean concentration/intensity was reported and could be expressed by MI = 1 −. The advances on both active and passive micromixers over the past five years were reviewed in this study

Active Micromixers
Pressure Field Driven Micromixers
Other Field Driven Micromixers
Passive Micromixer
Obstacle Based Micromixers
Convergence–Divergence Based Micromixer
Overbridge Based Micromixers
Findings
Conclusion and Future Trends

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.