Abstract

The physiological processes and mechanisms of an arterial system are complex and subtle. Physics-based models have been proven to be a very useful tool to simulate actual physiological behavior of the arteries. The current physics-based models include high-dimensional models (2D and 3D models) and low-dimensional models (0D, 1D and tube-load models). High-dimensional models can describe the local hemodynamic information of arteries in detail. With regard to an exact model of the whole arterial system, a high-dimensional model is computationally impracticable since the complex geometry, viscosity or elastic properties and complex vectorial output need to be provided. For low-dimensional models, the structure, centerline and viscosity or elastic properties only need to be provided. Therefore, low-dimensional modeling with lower computational costs might be a more applicable approach to represent hemodynamic properties of the entire arterial system and these three types of low-dimensional models have been extensively used in the study of cardiovascular dynamics. In recent decades, application of physics-based models to estimate central aortic pressure has attracted increasing interest. However, to our best knowledge, there has been few review paper about reconstruction of central aortic pressure using these physics-based models. In this paper, three types of low-dimensional physical models (0D, 1D and tube-load models) of systemic arteries are reviewed, the application of three types of models on estimation of central aortic pressure is taken as an example to discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and the proper choice of models for specific researches and applications are advised.

Highlights

  • Cardiovascular diseases have become a dominant factor of mortality all over the world [1]

  • To establish a 3D model of the entire arterial tree, the complex geometrical and mechanical information needs to be provided, which results in the enormous computational complexity, so that it cannot be readily implemented in practice

  • Tube-load models with various types of tubes based on different assumptions are investigated [77, 81, 83]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases have become a dominant factor of mortality all over the world [1]. 1D model can represent the wave propagation phenomenon accurately but need a relatively large amount of computation Taking advantage of both Windkessel models (simplicity) and 1D models (accuracy), some researchers developed tube-load models [20, 21]. Tube-load models can monitor multiple arterial hemodynamic parameters such as pulse transit time, arterial compliance, pulse wave velocity, and so on This paper is to review three types of low-dimensional physicsbased models (0D models, 1D models and tube-load models) of the arterial system and take the application of estimating central aortic pressure as an example to compare their advantages and disadvantages.

Discussions and conclusions
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call