Abstract

Simple SummaryComparing the cognitive capacities of nonhumans to those of humans can be quite difficult, particularly given that humans can be questioned directly (e.g., “How many?”, “What color?”) but that most nonhumans must be tested by various indirect means that might not demonstrate the full range of their capacities. A few nonhumans, however, have acquired some level of symbolic representation (e.g., labels for items such as physical objects and their attributes, for concepts and relations among these items and concepts, and for actions that can be carried out on or with these items), which allows for a limited form of interspecies communication that can be used for direct questioning. Why have so few nonhumans acquired this skill, and what are the advantages of having it? I describe a specific training procedure, the Model/Rival (M/R) protocol, that enabled several Grey parrots to learn some level of referential communication; I discuss the specific elements of such training that are both necessary and sufficient for successful acquisition and how lack of any of these elements can cause failure. I also describe some experiments that were facilitated by interspecies communication, and how acquisition of this ability might affect the extent to which nonhumans can process information.In this paper, I will review the Model/Rival (M/R) technique that has been used to establish interspecies communication with Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). I will describe the original format developed by Todt, the relationship to other forms of observational learning outlined by other researchers, and the adaptations that I devised. I will describe how my undergraduate trainers and I isolated the various components that constitute the technique and explain how each is necessary, but how only the combination of all components is sufficient for successful implementation—and how improper implementation can lead to failure. I will briefly summarize the results of proper implementation—including the importance of interspecies communication itself as a technique for studying animal cognition.

Highlights

  • Determining the cognitive capacities of nonhumans is not a simple task; just the act of devoting a special issue to the topic makes the problem abundantly clear

  • A very small number of individual nonhumans have acquired the form of symbolic representation described here—a few nonhuman primates, a few marine mammals, a few Grey parrots—and such studies are, for the most part, no longer in progress [76]

  • The primary point of this paper was not to review the overall field of interspecies communication, but rather to discuss the processes involved in the acquisition of such communication, from the standpoint of a set of studies on Grey parrots

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Determining the cognitive capacities of nonhumans is not a simple task; just the act of devoting a special issue to the topic makes the problem abundantly clear. For example: other than in studies with pre-verbal infants, humans are most often tested using their language abilities—by being asked pertinent questions— whereas nonhumans are mostly incapable of being tested in that manner What about those nonhumans who can be questioned in the same manner as humans? Any speaker of English would instantly understand what is being communicated by the label “green” in the latter case—as would a nonhuman who has acquire some level of symbolic reference. Such nonhumans can be tested via the use of interspecies communication [2]. I will review the various components that constitute the training technique, explain how each is necessary, and demonstrate how only the combination of all components is sufficient for successful implementation

Choice of Subject Species
Principle 1
Principle 2
Principle 3
Principle 4
Adapting the Principles to Training
Audiotape Instruction
Basic Videotape Input
Video Variant 1
Video Variant 2
Video Variants 3 and 4
LCD Video Training
Single Trainer Input
Why Do We Need Interspecies Communication?
Studies Facilitated by Interspecies Communication
Studies Critically Dependent upon Symbolic Representation
Discussion and Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.