A Review of Performance Management in State-owned Enterprises and Private Enterprises in China

Abstract

In order to improve profits, the theory of enterprise performance management has formed a corresponding theoretical framework and system. Enterprises can improve performance management methods based on their own situation. This research compares the differences between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises through literature review. The existing papers mainly focus on performance feedback and communication mechanisms, the application of performance management and corporate strategy, and the enthusiasm of employees to participate in performance management. The existing papers mainly focus on performance feedback and communication mechanisms, the application of performance management in line with company strategies, and the initiative of employees to participate in performance management. Neglecting the specific role of state-owned enterprises and not combining performance management with their social responsibility. In addition, the imperfect performance indicator system has also led to the problem of not being greatly influenced by subjective factors within the enterprise. The accuracy of performance evaluation in many enterprises is often influenced by human factors. The design of performance management evaluation indicators is not scientific, the evaluation is unfair, the concept of human resource management is lack of correctness, strategic planning, single evaluation results, ineffective use, lack of follow-up, and frequent communication in performance management; The recruitment and allocation of personnel are unreasonable, the construction of the management system is highly arbitrary, and there is a significant subjective bias in performance evaluation.