Accelerate Literature Icon
Want to do a literature review? Try our new Literature Review workflow

A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management

  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract
Translate article icon Translate Article Star icon

Artificial intelligence has been applied in wildfire science and management since the 1990s, with early applications including neural networks and expert systems. Since then, the field has rapidly progressed congruently with the wide adoption of machine learning (ML) methods in the environmental sciences. Here, we present a scoping review of ML applications in wildfire science and management. Our overall objective is to improve awareness of ML methods among wildfire researchers and managers, as well as illustrate the diverse and challenging range of problems in wildfire science available to ML data scientists. To that end, we first present an overview of popular ML approaches used in wildfire science to date and then review the use of ML in wildfire science as broadly categorized into six problem domains, including (i) fuels characterization, fire detection, and mapping; (ii) fire weather and climate change; (iii) fire occurrence, susceptibility, and risk; (iv) fire behavior prediction; (v) fire effects; and (vi) fire management. Furthermore, we discuss the advantages and limitations of various ML approaches relating to data size, computational requirements, generalizability, and interpretability, as well as identify opportunities for future advances in the science and management of wildfires within a data science context. In total, to the end of 2019, we identified 300 relevant publications in which the most frequently used ML methods across problem domains included random forests, MaxEnt, artificial neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, and genetic algorithms. As such, there exists opportunities to apply more current ML methods — including deep learning and agent-based learning — in the wildfire sciences, especially in instances involving very large multivariate datasets. We must recognize, however, that despite the ability of ML models to learn on their own, expertise in wildfire science is necessary to ensure realistic modelling of fire processes across multiple scales, while the complexity of some ML methods such as deep learning requires a dedicated and sophisticated knowledge of their application. Finally, we stress that the wildfire research and management communities play an active role in providing relevant, high-quality, and freely available wildfire data for use by practitioners of ML methods.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 3
  • 10.1259/bjr.20220373
Prediction of dose deposition matrix using voxel features driven machine learning approach.
  • Mar 6, 2023
  • The British Journal of Radiology
  • Shengxiu Jiao + 2 more

A dose deposition matrix (DDM) prediction method using several voxel features and a machine learning (ML) approach is proposed for plan optimization in radiation therapy. Head and lung cases with the inhomogeneous medium are used as training and testing data. The prediction model is a cascade forward backprop neural network where the input is the features of the voxel, including 1) voxel to body surface distance along the beamlet axis, 2) voxel to beamlet axis distance, 3) voxel density, 4) heterogeneity corrected voxel to body surface distance, 5) heterogeneity corrected voxel to beamlet axis, and (6) the dose of voxel obtained from the pencil beam (PB) algorithm. The output is the predicted voxel dose corresponding to a beamlet. The predicted DDM was used for plan optimization (ML method) and compared with the dose of MC-based plan optimization (MC method) and the dose of pencil beam-based plan optimization (PB method). The mean absolute error (MAE) value was calculated for full volume relative to the dose of the MC method to evaluate the overall dose performance of the final plan. For patient with head tumor, the ML method achieves MAE value 0.49 × 10-4 and PB has MAE 1.86 × 10-4. For patient with lung tumor, the ML method has MAE 1.42 × 10-4 and PB has MAE 3.72 × 10-4. The maximum percentage difference in PTV dose coverage (D98) between ML and MC methods is no more than 1.2% for patient with head tumor, while the difference is larger than 10% using the PB method. For patient with lung tumor, the maximum percentage difference in PTV dose coverage (D98) between ML and MC methods is no more than 2.1%, while the difference is larger than 16% using the PB method. In this work, a reliable DDM prediction method is established for plan optimization by applying several voxel features and the ML approach. The results show that the ML method based on voxel features can obtain plans comparable to the MC method and is better than the PB method in achieving accurate dose to the patient, which is helpful for rapid plan optimization and accurate dose calculation. Establishment of a new machine learning method based on the relationship between the voxel and beamlet features for dose deposition matrix prediction in radiation therapy.

  • Front Matter
  • Cite Count Icon 63
  • 10.1002/aps3.11371
Plants meet machines: Prospects in machine learning for plant biology
  • Jun 1, 2020
  • Applications in Plant Sciences
  • Pamela S Soltis + 3 more

Plants meet machines: Prospects in machine learning for plant biology

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 193
  • 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105961
Applications of machine learning in friction stir welding: Prediction of joint properties, real-time control and tool failure diagnosis
  • Feb 14, 2023
  • Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
  • Ammar H Elsheikh

Applications of machine learning in friction stir welding: Prediction of joint properties, real-time control and tool failure diagnosis

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 92
  • 10.1007/s12039-021-01995-2
Artificial intelligence: machine learning for chemical sciences.
  • Dec 21, 2021
  • Journal of chemical sciences (Bangalore, India)
  • Akshaya Karthikeyan + 1 more

Research in molecular sciences witnessed the rise and fall of Artificial Intelligence (AI)/ Machine Learning (ML) methods, especially artificial neural networks, few decades ago. However, we see a major resurgence in the use of modern ML methods in scientific research during the last few years. These methods have had phenomenal success in the areas of computer vision, speech recognition, natural language processing (NLP), etc. This has inspired chemists and biologists to apply these algorithms to problems in natural sciences. Availability of high performance Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) accelerators, large datasets, new algorithms, and libraries has enabled this surge. ML algorithms have successfully been applied to various domains in molecular sciences by providing much faster and sometimes more accurate solutions compared to traditional methods like Quantum Mechanical (QM) calculations, Density Functional Theory (DFT) or Molecular Mechanics (MM) based methods, etc. Some of the areas where the potential of ML methods are shown to be effective are in drug design, prediction of high–level quantum mechanical energies, molecular design, molecular dynamics materials, and retrosynthesis of organic compounds, etc. This article intends to conceptually introduce various modern ML methods and their relevance and applications in computational natural sciences.Graphical abstract Synopsis Recent surge in the application of machine learning (ML) methods in fundamental sciences has led to a perspective that these methods may become important tools in chemical science. This perspective provides an overview of the modern ML methods and their successful applications in chemistry during the last few years.

  • Book Chapter
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v8/3919f
Clinical Applications of Machine Learning in Stroke Care
  • Aug 9, 2021
  • Jing Zhang

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. In recent years, machine learning (ML) methods have been increasingly applied to stroke care. This  research work  reviewed studies using ML approach in stroke care to provide an overview of this field. The advances of ML techniques have made it possible to automatically examine carotid plaques (for stroke risk stratification), detect stroke lesions on imaging, identify possible treatment complications in patients, facilitate brain-computer-interface (BCI)-aided rehabilitation, and predict stroke prognosis. The performances of certain machine learning applications are non-inferior to clinicians in areas such as measuring carotid intima-media thickness and detecting early damage of ischemic stroke on CT imaging. In addition, ML applications in clinical outcome prediction have similar or better performances than the conventional method logistic regression. However, there are still challenges in areas such as automated lesion segmentation, BCI-aided rehabilitation and long-term stroke prognosis prediction. Newly developed ML methods such as deep learning may be promising to overcome the challenges. Further research is needed to verify and optimize these ML applications, and large-sample studies and proper validation are warranted to make these ML methods more accurate, generalizable and reliable. As the need for precision medicine in stroke grows and as the technology of machine learning advances, it is anticipated that the potential of machine learning applications will be released to improve computer-aided stroke prevention and transform conventional stroke medicine into data-driven personalized stroke management, which will reduce morbidity and mortality rates, enhance stroke care and set patients free from stroke-caused disability.   

  • PDF Download Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 40
  • 10.3390/cancers15123237
Identification of Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Gene Signature Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Assisted Transcriptomics Analysis
  • Jun 18, 2023
  • Cancers
  • Zeenat Mirza + 7 more

Simple SummaryBreast cancer is the most fatal female cancer, which the existing clinical and pathological information sometimes fails to diagnose accurately. Recent artificial intelligence-based studies have shown the capability of identifying molecular biomarkers using high-throughput genomics data. Our aim was to apply machine learning methods to a large cohort of transcriptomics data for gene reduction and the construction of a diagnostic model for cancer classification. Advanced statistical methods and cross-validation with another set of machine learning methods increased the accuracy of the diagnostic model and predicted a novel diagnostic nine-gene signature. Further, survival analysis revealed a novel prognostic model of eight-gene signatures. Experimental validation confirmed the expression of the identified gene signatures in breast cancer patients and increased the reliability of the study. The identified gene signature biomarkers have the potential to improve healthcare management with precise diagnosis and prognosis at a reduced cost.Background: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common female cancers. Clinical and histopathological information is collectively used for diagnosis, but is often not precise. We applied machine learning (ML) methods to identify the valuable gene signature model based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for BC diagnosis and prognosis. Methods: A cohort of 701 samples from 11 GEO BC microarray datasets was used for the identification of significant DEGs. Seven ML methods, including RFECV-LR, RFECV-SVM, LR-L1, SVC-L1, RF, and Extra-Trees were applied for gene reduction and the construction of a diagnostic model for cancer classification. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed for prognostic signature construction. The potential biomarkers were confirmed via qRT-PCR and validated by another set of ML methods including GBDT, XGBoost, AdaBoost, KNN, and MLP. Results: We identified 355 DEGs and predicted BC-associated pathways, including kinetochore metaphase signaling, PTEN, senescence, and phagosome-formation pathways. A hub of 28 DEGs and a novel diagnostic nine-gene signature (COL10A, S100P, ADAMTS5, WISP1, COMP, CXCL10, LYVE1, COL11A1, and INHBA) were identified using stringent filter conditions. Similarly, a novel prognostic model consisting of eight-gene signatures (CCNE2, NUSAP1, TPX2, S100P, ITM2A, LIFR, TNXA, and ZBTB16) was also identified using disease-free survival and overall survival analysis. Gene signatures were validated by another set of ML methods. Finally, qRT-PCR results confirmed the expression of the identified gene signatures in BC. Conclusion: The ML approach helped construct novel diagnostic and prognostic models based on the expression profiling of BC. The identified nine-gene signature and eight-gene signatures showed excellent potential in BC diagnosis and prognosis, respectively.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 15
  • 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104489
An investigation of machine learning methods applied to genomic prediction in yellow-feathered broilers
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • Poultry Science
  • Bogong Liu + 6 more

An investigation of machine learning methods applied to genomic prediction in yellow-feathered broilers

  • Single Report
  • 10.2172/2563534
Machine Learning Approaches to Predicting Induced Seismicity and Imaging Geothermal Reservoir Properties
  • Mar 24, 2025
  • Chris Marone

This project developed machine learning (ML) methods, lab data sets, and field data to advance geothermal exploration and geothermal energy production. The work had three focus areas. One involved the development of ML methods to use microearthquakes (MEQs) for imaging geothermal reservoir properties and improving subsurface characterization – most importantly the evolution of permeability within the evolving reservoir. This part of the work included development of ML approaches for automated MEQ location, focal mechanism determination and identification of earthquake precursors. The second area focused on using MEQ signals generated by geothermal exploration and production to predict the relationship between fluid injection and seismicity. Here, we extended to reservoir scale our success in using ML to predict laboratory earthquakes and fault zone stress state. The third focus area was on lab experiments. Here, we developed new ML models for lab earthquake prediction and identification of precursors to failure to improve earthquake forecasting and early warning in geothermal settings. Major outcomes of our work include ML models that learn from MEQ signals during geothermal exploration and production to predict induced seismicity. MEQs occur naturally in connection with drilling and energy production. We developed ML methods to use the seismic waves from these events to characterize the elastic, hydraulic and poromechanical properties of reservoirs. Our work illuminated fracture geometry and the evolution of fracture permeability by incorporating seismic coda wave analysis and ML methods to relate fluid injection and seismicity. We significantly expanded laboratory earthquake prediction to include methods that use both passive measurements of microearthquakes within the lab fault zones and also active source acoustic measurements of fault zone elastic properties. These methods can now predict fault zone stress state, time to failure and the magnitude of lab earthquakes. Our work showed that repetitive stick- slip failure events during frictional sliding (the lab equivalent of earthquakes) are preceded by a cascade of micro-failure events that radiate energy in a manner that foretells unstable failure – manifest as laboratory MEQs. We documented a mapping between fracture properties and statistical attributes of elastic radiation. We extended existing works to geothermal reservoir scale and developed ML methods to determine reservoir permeability, fracture properties, and their evolution during geothermal energy production. An attractive feature of ML algorithms is their ability to handle big datasets and reveal patterns and correlations that may remain invisible to conventional analyses. Our work connected data from field, laboratory and intermediate scales to study permeability, stress, strength, fracture stiffness and geometry. At the field scale we used data from the Newberry Volcano field site, UtahFORGE, EGS Collab, and also the Bedretto underground research lab in Switzerland. These data sets are bridging the gap between the lab scale, theory, and reservoir scale. Our work produced plain language summaries to improve public understanding of DOE research. We also developed openly distributed ML and seismicity datasets for use by all researchers and we published connections between induced seismicity in geothermal areas and reservoir properties including permeability, fracture properties, and stress state. Our models are designed for the large data sets of induced seismicity typically associated with geothermal sites. We produced labeled event catalogs and used them on geothermal data to assess how ML can facilitate geothermal production and exploration. All datasets are available on the GDR Productivity: The project produced 32 publications in peer reviewed journals (two are in review). It supported the work of 6 PhD students, 40 conference presentations, 6 keynote talks at national meetings, and mentoring and professional development for 4 postdoctoral fellows.

  • Conference Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.4271/2024-01-2529
Machine Learning for Road Vehicle Aerodynamics
  • Apr 9, 2024
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • Vidyasagar Ananthan + 11 more

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper discusses an emerging area of applying machine learning (ML) methods to augment traditional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of road vehicle aerodynamics. ML methods have the potential to both reduce the computational effort to predict a new geometry or car condition and to explore a greater number of design parameters with the same computational budget. Similar to traditional CFD methods, there exists a broad range of approaches. In particular, the accuracy and computational efficiency of a CFD simulation vary greatly depending on the choice of turbulence model (DNS, LES, RANS) and the underlying spatial and temporal numerical discretizations. Similarly, the end-user must select the correct ML method depending on the use-case, the available input data, and the trade-off between accuracy and computational cost. In this paper, we showcase several case studies using various data-driven ML methods to highlight the promise of these approaches. Whilst these case studies are not comprehensive investigations of the underlying methods and do not include all possible ML approaches (i.e., physics-driven), they highlight the ability of these models to in general predict new designs in near real-time (i.e., less than 5 seconds), after typically less than 1 hour of training on a single GPU. There still exists a need for high quality training data from traditional CFD methods and high-fidelity CFD simulations to validate the ML predictions. Thus, ML approaches should be seen as tools to augment traditional CFD methods rather than to replace them. While this work focuses on preliminary studies, future work will look at more comprehensive real-world/industrial-size calculations for the more promising technologies identified here.</div></div>

  • PDF Download Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 80
  • 10.1016/j.trechm.2020.10.007
Chemist versus Machine: Traditional Knowledge versus Machine Learning Techniques
  • Nov 9, 2020
  • Trends in Chemistry
  • Janine George + 1 more

Chemical heuristics have been fundamental to the advancement of chemistry and materials science. These heuristics are typically established by scientists using knowledge and creativity to extract patterns from limited datasets. Machine learning offers opportunities to perfect this approach using computers and larger datasets. Here, we discuss the relationships between traditional heuristics and machine learning approaches. We show how traditional rules can be challenged by large-scale statistical assessment and how traditional concepts commonly used as features are feeding the machine learning techniques. We stress the waste involved in relearning chemical rules and the challenges in terms of data size requirements for purely data-driven approaches. Our view is that heuristic and machine learning approaches are at their best when they work together.

  • PDF Download Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 3211
  • 10.1016/j.csbj.2014.11.005
Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction
  • Nov 15, 2014
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
  • Konstantina Kourou + 4 more

Cancer has been characterized as a heterogeneous disease consisting of many different subtypes. The early diagnosis and prognosis of a cancer type have become a necessity in cancer research, as it can facilitate the subsequent clinical management of patients. The importance of classifying cancer patients into high or low risk groups has led many research teams, from the biomedical and the bioinformatics field, to study the application of machine learning (ML) methods. Therefore, these techniques have been utilized as an aim to model the progression and treatment of cancerous conditions. In addition, the ability of ML tools to detect key features from complex datasets reveals their importance. A variety of these techniques, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Bayesian Networks (BNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and Decision Trees (DTs) have been widely applied in cancer research for the development of predictive models, resulting in effective and accurate decision making. Even though it is evident that the use of ML methods can improve our understanding of cancer progression, an appropriate level of validation is needed in order for these methods to be considered in the everyday clinical practice. In this work, we present a review of recent ML approaches employed in the modeling of cancer progression. The predictive models discussed here are based on various supervised ML techniques as well as on different input features and data samples. Given the growing trend on the application of ML methods in cancer research, we present here the most recent publications that employ these techniques as an aim to model cancer risk or patient outcomes.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 49
  • 10.15480/882.2478
A literature review on machine learning in supply chain management
  • Jan 1, 2019
  • Econstor (Econstor)
  • Hannah Wenzel + 2 more

Purpose: In recent years, a number of practical logistic applications of machine learning (ML) have emerged, especially in Supply Chain Management (SCM). By linking applied ML methods to the SCM task model, the paper indicates the current applications in SCM and visualises potential research gaps. Methodology: Relevant papers with applications of ML in SCM are extracted based on a literature review of a period of 10 years (2009-2019). The used ML methods are linked to the SCM model, creating a reciprocal mapping. Findings: This paper results in an overview of ML applications and methods currently used in the area of SCM. Successfully applied ML methods in SCM in industry and examples from theoretical approaches are displayed for each task within the SCM task model. Originality: Linking the SC task model with current application areas of ML yields an overview of ML in SCM. This facilitates the identification of potential areas of application to companies, as well as potential future research areas to science.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 31
  • 10.1557/mrs.2020.163
Adaptive machine learning for efficient materials design
  • Jul 1, 2020
  • MRS Bulletin
  • Prasanna V Balachandran

Abstract

  • PDF Download Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 22
  • 10.3390/cancers13143611
Assessing Versatile Machine Learning Models for Glioma Radiogenomic Studies across Hospitals
  • Jul 19, 2021
  • Cancers
  • Risa K Kawaguchi + 8 more

Simple SummaryRadiogenomics enables prediction of the status and prognosis of patients using non-invasively obtained imaging data. Current machine learning (ML) methods used in radiogenomics require huge datasets, which involve the handling of large heterogeneous datasets from multiple cohorts/hospitals. In this study, two different glioma datasets were used to test various ML and image pre-processing methods to confirm whether the models trained on one dataset are universally applicable to other datasets. Our result suggested that the ML method that yielded the highest accuracy in a single dataset was likely to be overfitted. We demonstrated that implementation of standardization and dimension reduction procedures prior to classification, enabled the development of ML methods that are less affected by the multiple cohort difference. We advocate using caution in interpreting the results of radiogenomic studies of the training and testing datasets that are small or mixed, with a view to implementing practical ML methods in radiogenomics.Radiogenomics use non-invasively obtained imaging data, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to predict critical biomarkers of patients. Developing an accurate machine learning (ML) technique for MRI requires data from hundreds of patients, which cannot be gathered from any single local hospital. Hence, a model universally applicable to multiple cohorts/hospitals is required. We applied various ML and image pre-processing procedures on a glioma dataset from The Cancer Image Archive (TCIA, n = 159). The models that showed a high level of accuracy in predicting glioblastoma or WHO Grade II and III glioma using the TCIA dataset, were then tested for the data from the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan (NCC, n = 166) whether they could maintain similar levels of high accuracy. Results: we confirmed that our ML procedure achieved a level of accuracy (AUROC = 0.904) comparable to that shown previously by the deep-learning methods using TCIA. However, when we directly applied the model to the NCC dataset, its AUROC dropped to 0.383. Introduction of standardization and dimension reduction procedures before classification without re-training improved the prediction accuracy obtained using NCC (0.804) without a loss in prediction accuracy for the TCIA dataset. Furthermore, we confirmed the same tendency in a model for IDH1/2 mutation prediction with standardization and application of dimension reduction that was also applicable to multiple hospitals. Our results demonstrated that overfitting may occur when an ML method providing the highest accuracy in a small training dataset is used for different heterogeneous data sets, and suggested a promising process for developing an ML method applicable to multiple cohorts.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 3
  • 10.1111/odi.15300
Application of Machine Learning in the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders: An Overview.
  • Mar 3, 2025
  • Oral diseases
  • Xiayanran Wu + 6 more

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) refer to a group of disorders related to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the diagnosis of which is important in dental practice but remains challenging for nonspecialists. With the development of machine learning (ML) methods, ML-based TMDsdiagnostic models have shown great potential. The purpose of this review is to summarize the application of ML in TMDs diagnosis, as well as future directions and possible challenges. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were searched for electronic literature published up to October 2024, in order to describe the current application of ML in the classification and diagnosis of TMDs. We summarized the application of various ML methods in the diagnosis and classification of different subtypes of TMDs and described the role of different imaging modalities in constructing diagnostic models. Ultimately, we discussed future directions and challenges that ML methods may confront in the application of TMDs diagnosis. The screening and diagnosis models of TMDsbased on ML methods hold significant potential for clinical application, but still need to be further verified by a large number of multicenter data and longitudinal studies.

Save Icon
Up Arrow
Open/Close
Notes

Save Important notes in documents

Highlight text to save as a note, or write notes directly

You can also access these Documents in Paperpal, our AI writing tool

Powered by our AI Writing Assistant