Abstract
Over the past 10 years, fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FE-LIF) has been widely reported as a rational alternative to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), and several FE approaches for interbody fusion have been published. The short-term surgical outcomes of FE-LIF are reportedly superior to those of MIS-TLIF and conventional posterior LIF in terms of intraoperative blood loss and short-term back pain. However, the complication rate, medium-term clinical outcomes, and fusion rate have not been reported to be different in all uncontrolled studies. The challenges associated with FE-LIF include a longer operative time, which means a steep learning curve, and limited surgical indications, which leads to patient selection bias. FE-LIF is an excellent surgical option for treating degenerative disc disease, spinal instability, and spondylolisthesis. Although the amount of evidence is very small in existing studies and the long-term follow-up data are limited, this technique shows favorable clinical outcomes in selected patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.