A review of biomechanical studies for mandibular angle fracture internal fixation

Fernando P.S Guastaldi

doi:10.31579/2643-6612/020

Abstract

Mandible fractures correspond to 19-40% of all facial fractures. Among all mandible fractures, 12-30% are fractures of the mandibular angle. These fractures are mainly caused by sports activities, interpersonal violence and car accidents. The presence of the third molar and the thin transverse bone area seem to be responsible for the frequent involvement of the mandibular angle in facial fractures. Before the advent of antibiotics, a high frequency of infection was always associated after an open reduction in mandibular angle fractures. Wired osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) were traditional methods for fixing mandibular angle fractures. The limitation of both methods has influenced the development of new approaches for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Currently, osteosynthesis of mandibular angle fractures with plates and screws has become an effective treatment option. Several forms are described in the literature as: fixation of bone segments with a miniplate on the upper edge of the mandible, fixation with two miniplates, lag screw or by a single rigid plate on the lower edge of the mandible. The purpose of this study was to summarize the main characteristics of biomechanical studies such as the type of mandible source used, the plating techniques employed, the plate material, and the loading protocols used to evaluate the stability of the fixation methods. The Medline (PubMed) database was searched combining relevant terms and pertinent articles in English were included. Articles had to meet the following inclusion criteria: be in vitro biomechanical studies evaluating fixation methods for mandibular angle fractures. A total of 27 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Synthetic mandibles (n=12), animal mandibles (n=9), and human cadaveric mandibles (n=5) were used as the sample source to perform the biomechanical analysis. One article used both synthetic and human cadaveric mandibles. Also, a variety of fixation techniques was described such as mini-plates, lag-screws, reconstruction plates, and three-dimensional plates. The materials of the bone plates used were: stainless steel, commercially pure titanium, titanium alloy or bioresorbable. However, there was inconsistency in reporting the materials and not all studies clearly stated the material of the bone plates. For the biomechanical analysis, there was a high variation among all studies regarding the loading protocols used. The same side of fixation, the anterior part of the mandible (central incisors) or the contralateral side were reported as the dentate regions in which the force was applied. For more than 2 decades, in vitro biomechanical studies have been used to help researchers and clinicians in the field of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery to properly evaluate and compare the different devices and techniques available for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Also, biomechanical studies are important to answer questions on fatigue performance and fracture strength on the gross level.

Highlights

The mandible is the largest, strongest and the only movable stress bearing bone of the face (Wong et al, 2011)
The distribution of fracture sites seems to be influenced by the cause of the injury, which in turn is influenced by geographic locations, local behavior, and socioeconomic trends (Erdmann et al, 2008; Bormann et al, 2009). These injuries are related to a traumatic incidence including traffic accident, interpersonal violence, falls, and sport injuries (Zachariades et al, 2006; Jain et al, 2009).Mandible fractures correspond to 19-40% of all facial fractures
The purpose of this study was to summarize the main characteristics of biomechanical studies such as the type of mandible source used, the plating techniques employed, the plate material, and the loading protocols used to evaluate the stability of the fixation methods

Summary

Introduction

The mandible is the largest, strongest and the only movable stress bearing bone of the face (Wong et al, 2011). The distribution of fracture sites seems to be influenced by the cause of the injury, which in turn is influenced by geographic locations, local behavior, and socioeconomic trends (Erdmann et al, 2008; Bormann et al, 2009). These injuries are related to a traumatic incidence including traffic accident, interpersonal violence, falls, and sport injuries (Zachariades et al, 2006; Jain et al, 2009).Mandible fractures correspond to 19-40% of all facial fractures. 12-30% account for fractures of the mandibular angle (Allareddy et al, 2011) (Figure 1).

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion