Abstract
Peter Ladefoged's discussion note in Language 68 (December, 1992:80911), 'Another view of endangered languages', responds in a general way to the 'Endangered languages' papers of Ken Hale, Michael Krauss, Lucille Watahomigie & Akira Yamamoto, Colette Craig, LaVerne Masayesva Jeanne, and Nora England in Language 68 (March, 1992:1-42). In what follows I would like to respond in a specific way to some of the views put forth in Ladefoged's discussion note. I base my comments purely on Ladefoged's own positions, without reference to the papers he was responding to, since it is his arguments which raise the issues I would like to take up.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
