Abstract
Michael Maltz bases his critique of our article, “Forecasting Highway Casualties: The British Road Safety Act and a Sense of Deja Vu,” primarily on W.S. Robinson's concept of the ecological fallacy. We feel Maltz's comments overreach any justification based on Robinson's theory and that they are a disservice. The following response reaffirms the validity of the variables we used.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
