Abstract
While avowing his concern for the “scholarly reputation of IJMES,” Michael Gunter is denouncing my lack of “common sense” and my “audacity to argue incongruously” in the debate about the general validity of the Naim-Andonian documents. To substantiate his argument Gunter once more resorts to the method of truncation through deletions; the essential part of my phrase is deliberately excised from the quotation he used.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
