Abstract
AbstractIn the product design phase, the available product failure data are limited, and the weight allocation method is often used to assign reliability targets to each unit. The integrated factors method (IFM) can calculate the reliability allocation weights considering multiple influencing factors simultaneously, but it cannot reflect the difference in the importance of each factor and each unit. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) can calculate the relative importance weights of each factor and each unit. Combining the AHP with the IFM can make the IFM more adaptable to the system and more accurate for reliability allocation. However, the current combination method can cause two problems: the invalidation of the influencing factor weights and the imbalance of the unit weights. To address these two shortcomings, the AHP‐IFM proposed in this paper introduces a weight weakening factor and exponentially corrects the unit weights for units, which can better apply the relative importance weights of each influencing factor and each unit to the reliability allocation. The effectiveness of the AHP‐IFM is verified by comparison with existing methods and data. Finally, an AHP‐IFM applicable to agricultural machinery is proposed, and the reliability allocation of a no‐till seeder is used as a case to verify the feasibility of the AHP‐IFM.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.