A reassessment of the fungicidal efficacy of 1,3-dichloropropene, chloropicrin, and metam potassium against Macrophomina phaseolina in strawberry.

Abstract

The effectiveness of metam potassium, 1,3-dichloropropene, chloropicrin, and different ratios of 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin on the reduction of natural and artificial inoculum of Macrophomina phaseolina were investigated in laboratory and field experiments. Additionally, a multivariate meta-analysis with data from six field trials conducted in Florida from 2012 to 2018 was performed. In small-plot field experiments using drip stakes, the highest rate (468 L ha-1 ) of metam potassium was most effective in controlling M. phaseolina in infected crowns buried at 15.2cm from the point of fumigant injection, whereas none of the rates was able to reduce inoculum buried at 30.5cm. In closed-container experiments, use of the highest rate of 1,3-dichloropropene (168 kg ha-1 ) resulted in the highest level of pathogen control. Different rates of chloropicrin also reduced inoculum when compared to the non-treated control. 1,3-dichloropropene + chloropicrin at different ratios were also highly effective in controlling M. phaseolina. Results from the meta-analysis of open-field experiments indicated that metam potassium and 1,3-dichloropropene + chloropicrin (63:35, v:v) treatments were significantly more effective in reducing M. phaseolina than the 1,3-dichloropropene + chloropicrin (39:60, v:v) treatment; however, metam potassium was not as effective at the side of the beds. 1,3-dichloropropene alone and in mixture with chloropicrin were more effective in reducing inoculum of M. phaseolina than chloropicrin alone, indicating the fungicidal efficacy of 1,3-dichloropropene. Formulation with higher 1,3-dichloropropene concentration performed better than the formulation with higher chloropicrin concentration in field trials. Metam potassium was effective when applied at the highest rate, but with limited lateral movement perpendicular to the drip irrigation line. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.