Abstract
Abstract Case Report A 62–year–old man, history of hypertension. In 2015, there was suspicion of non–compaction cardiomyopathy, and he underwent cardiac MRI at another facility (report not available). The patient reported palpitations and dyspnea with exertion, leading to a follow–up visit. EKG showed sinus rhythm 90/min, nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay and isolated monomorphic ventricular ectopic beats. Echo revealed a mildly dilated left ventricle (end–diastolic volume 88 ml/m), systolic function at the lower limits of normal (EF 53%), and prominent muscular structures near the posterior interventricular septum (SIV), likely related to anomalies of the papillary muscles (prominent and possibly duplicated posterior–medial papillary muscle). There was apical trabecular protrusion, which did not meet the criteria for non–compaction (NC/C ratio in systole approximately 1), with no other significant findings. The cardiac MRI, performed to assess dilated cardiomyopathy, revealed a conspicuous structural abnormality in the septo–papillary region, located medio–apically and paraseptal–endocardial in the left ventricle. This anomaly lacked evident chordae tendineae with the mitral valve leaflets and exhibited synchronous systo–diastolic motion with the left ventricular wall, suggesting septal duplication. The septal thickness was slightly reduced, particularly in the medio–apical region. Additionally, there was hypertrabeculation of the posterior and lateral walls of the left ventricle, exceeding the threshold for non–compaction (NC/C ratio in end–diastole: 2.6 – normal range: <2.3). Left ventricular mass was normal (mass: 173.52 g; mass/body surface area (BSA): 86.58 g/m). Basal septum, medio–apical septum and medio–apical lateral wallshowed hypokinetic contractility. The left ventricle was dilated (end–diastolic diameter: 55.0 mm; end–systolic diameter: 45.3 mm – end–diastolic volume: 230 ml; stroke volume/BSA: 57.6 ml/m² – EF: 51%). Areas of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were observed in the anterior medio–basal septum and at the site of the described structural muscular anomaly, both displaying an intramural non–ischemic pattern. Conclusions The described findings suggest a picture of dilated cardiomyopathy and an associated structural septo–papillary anomaly of uncertain diagnostic interpretation (septum duplication with associated non–compacted myocardium? duplicated posterior–medial papillary muscle with associated non–compacted myocardium?).
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have