Abstract

In an attempt to investigate the vulnerability of the syntax-pragmatics interface and to shed light on the acquisition of subjects and objects in two different languages, namely the [+null subject] language Spanish and the [-null subject] language French, this article presents evi-dence from a crossectional and crosslinguistic university classroom study. The experiment in-vestigated various linguistic structures whose use is determined by information structure: pre-verbal subjects, null subjects, postverbal subjects and in situ objects with preverbal subjects, in situ objects with null subjects, Clitic Left Dislocations (CLLD) with null and with postverbal subjects in Spanish; subject clitics, subject dislocations, c'est clefts and in situ objects with subject clitics, in situ objects with subject dislocations, CLLDs with subject clefts and with subject dislocations in French. 76 English learners of French, 67 English learners of Spanish as well as 5 native French controls and 8 native Spanish controls participated in the study. Re-sults of the rating task evaluating learners' pragmatic intuitions indicate a crosslinguistic rank order of acquisition.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Interface Hypothesis Researchers in language acquisition have for quite some time been interested in interfaces, which can be defined as "loci of information integration across modules of language and/or external cognitive domains" (Rothman 2012: 3)

  • Differ significantly from NS in their interpretation of null subjects as topics. This indicates that null subjects are acquired very early in the acquisition, and that postverbal subjects are acquired the latest, some time between the high intermediate and advanced level

  • It seems that learners are able to very early on reset the null-subject parameter from their L1 to the [+ null subject] setting and that learners even at the low intermediate level have an understanding of the existence of null subjects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Interface Hypothesis Researchers in language acquisition have for quite some time been interested in interfaces, which can be defined as "loci of information integration across modules of language and/or external cognitive domains" (Rothman 2012: 3). Every speaker has a grammar consisting of several modules (syntax, semantics, phonology) as well as a pragmatic system at their disposal. This interaction among these different domains of language modules with the pragmatic system The term Interface Hypothesis (IH) first appeared in Sorace and Filiaci's (2006) study even though the phenomena associated with it had been under investigation before. This early original version of the IH predicts that properties at linguistic interfaces may be more vulnerable to errors, fossilization and incomplete acquisition than intra-module properties (cf Sorace 2003). Structures that involve an interface between syntax and other cognitive domains may cause optionality and instability whereas structures that require only syn-

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call