Abstract

Many international schools develop a formal written language policy to address language learning and use. Additionally, schools often develop a language policy as part of an authorization and or accreditation process. Although a school may have a formal written language policy, sometimes teachers are unaware the policy exists. The purpose of this study was to examine teacher knowledge of language policy in English-medium international schools in East Asia. Additionally, the researchers explored whether there were differences in teacher knowledge of language policy between schools that have an affiliation with CIS, IB, and ACS WASC and schools with no affiliation. Further, the researchers examined how often teachers followed the language policy and if the policy defined the roles of teachers. This quantitative survey-based study had 544 participants, of whom 387 were teachers. The main finding revealed that a sizeable percentage of teachers reported that their school does not have a formal written language policy or were unsure if one exists. Additional findings revealed similarities in language policy knowledge between CIS and IB schools and schools with no affiliation. Further, less than half of the teachers follow the language policy consistently, and many policies do not specify teacher roles.

Highlights

  • As of December 2019, ISC Research (2019) reported there were more than 11,000 international schools worldwide and earlier predicted that the number of international schools will rise to 16,000 by the year 2026 with an enrollment of 8.75 million students (Independent Education Today, 2016)

  • The percentages of teachers in schools affiliated with Council of International Schools (CIS), International Baccalaureate (IB), and ACS Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC) answering there was no policy or did not know if a policy existed is disturbing

  • The main finding of the study revealed that 38.5% percent of teachers in international schools in East Asia reported that their school either does not have a formal written language policy or were unsure if one exists

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As of December 2019, ISC Research (2019) reported there were more than 11,000 international schools worldwide and earlier predicted that the number of international schools will rise to 16,000 by the year 2026 with an enrollment of 8.75 million students (Independent Education Today, 2016). Because English has become a global language, local parents often seek to enroll their children in English-medium international schools as a means of preparing their children to study at a university in a native-speaking English country (Sears, 2015). As a result, establishing institutional legitimacy is a priority of many international schools (Bunnell, Fertig, & James, 2016; 2017), with some schools seeking accreditation as a means of remaining competitive and differentiating themselves in such a competitive market (Machin, 2017). Artifacts and evidence often include policy documents, including a formal written language policy. The problem is that some schools are submitting language policies as evidence for accreditation and authorization but are failing to implement the policy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call