Abstract
Despite guidelines on mixed methods writing practices, the process of turning a mixed methods dissertation into a peer-reviewed publication is unknown, which may hinder scientific advancements and the use of mixed methods research across disciplines. This qualitative study explored recent doctorates’ experiences across three dimensions (i.e., critical decisions about the process, challenges, and recommendations for scholars) through nine semi-structured interviews. We identified themes under each dimension, respectively: (a) considerations for authorship decisions, disentangling the publication process, and the role of support systems; (b) challenges preparing a manuscript for submission and challenges with the journal review process; and (c) the value of time for publication process. This study contributes to the field of mixed methods research by offering empirical evidence and insights.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
