Abstract

Exome-based testing for genetic diseases can reveal unsolicited findings (UFs), i.e. predispositions for diseases that exceed the diagnostic question. Knowledge of patients’ interpretation of possible UFs and of motives for (not) wanting to know UFs is still limited. This lacking knowledge may impede effective counselling that meets patients’ needs. Therefore, this article examines the meaning of UFs from a patient perspective. A qualitative study was conducted and an interpretative phenomenological analysis was made of 14 interviews with patients with an inherited retinal disease. Patients assign a complex meaning to UFs, including three main components. The first component focuses on result-specific qualities, i.e. the characteristics of an UF (inclusive of actionability, penetrance, severity and age of onset) and the consequences of disclosure; the second component applies to a patient’s lived illness experiences and to the way these contrast with reflections on presymptomatic UFs; the third component addresses a patient’s family embedding and its effect on concerns about disease prognosis and genetic information’s family relevance. The complex meaning structure of UFs suggests the need for counselling procedures that transcend a strictly clinical approach. Counselling should be personalised and consider patients’ lived illness experiences and family context.

Highlights

  • Exome-based testing for genetic diseases can reveal unsolicited findings (UFs), i.e. predispositions for diseases that exceed the diagnostic question

  • This study investigated the meaning of UFs in a diagnostic context from the perspective of adult patients with an inherited retinal disease (IRD)

  • This meaning was composed of three components that referred to qualities of the UF itself, patients’ lived illness experiences and family embedding

Read more

Summary

Methods

The design and analysis of this qualitative study are based on the method of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)[22]. IPA aims to clarify personal meanings of lived experiences or specific objects (‘phenomena’) in a homogeneous group of ­people[22] This method is frequently used to understand subjective experiences in healthcare and health psychology and it has been applied in patients’ interpretation of genetic ­results[23, 24]. After the interview, asked us for (professional) psychological support (which happened once), they were referred to a genetic counsellor affiliated with the university hospital in which recruitment occurred. T.M. independently analysed a subset of the data to validate the analysis of M.S. and T.M. and M.S. thoroughly discussed transcripts and theme definitions and connections. All participants signed an informed consent form which included a statement on the anonymised publication of study results

Results
Family relevance of genetic information Continued
Family embedding
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call