A prospective randomised trial comparing the analgesic efficacy of postoperative infusion of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine in orthopaedic surgeries

Abstract

Background: Epidural administration of local anaesthetic provides effective pain relief. Commonly used epidural local anaesthetics are bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Most studies compared these drugs along with an opioid or any other adjuvants like clonidine, dexmedetomidine etc. Our aim was to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine without any adjuvants in postoperative patients. Materials and methods: A prospective randomized clinical study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in 60 patients between the age groups of 20-years and 60-years undergoing elective lower limb orthopaedic procedures. Total patients were divided into two groups (A and B) of 30 each. Continuous epidural infusion was started with 6ml per hour of 0.125% bupivacaine in Group A and 6ml per hour of 0.2% ropivacaine in Group B postoperatively. After the commencement of epidural infusions, heart rate, blood pressure, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and supplementary analgesic requirement were monitored postoperatively for 48 hrs. Results: Our observations showed no significant difference in haemodynamic parameters like heart rate and blood pressure. VAS showed a statistically significant difference with higher mean VAS score in Group B patients at one hour (p value = 0.0126), 12 hrs (p value = 0.031) and 24 hrs (p value = 0.0421) as compared to Group A. Add on analgesic requirement was also higher for Group B patients. Conclusions: Both bupivacaine and ropivacaine can be used effectively for postoperative analgesia but bupivacaine has a superior analgesic efficacy than ropivacaine with similar safety profile.