Abstract
Introduction: General anesthetic procedure requires a safe and open airway. Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard for airway management; it is being replaced by supraglottic airway devices because they are easy to introduce, better tolerated and results in a lesser haemodynamic response. As both the Baska mask and I-gel have a non-inflatable self-sealing mechanism, these two devices were compared in our study in terms of time taken for insertion, airway sealing pressure, the number of attempts, hemodynamic changes, and complications. Methods: A Prospective comparative study was conducted on 90 patients (45 in each group), aged 18-60 years, undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia at Tertiary care Hospital, Madurai. Patients were randomized into two groups using the computer generated statistical software STATA version14 (Texas, USA): Group B: Airway was secured by insertion of Baska mask. Group I: Airway was secured by insertion of I Gel. Following assessments were done to evaluate the SAD: Time taken to insert the device, airway sealing pressure, rate of successful insertion, number of attempts, Haemodynamic parameters, laryngopharyngeal morbidity. Data were analyzed using Student t-tests and chi-square tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: The mean airway sealing pressure of the Baska mask (26.1+6.1 cmH2O) was significantly higher than that of the I-gel (23.1± 5.9 cmH2O) with a P value of 0.019 which was statistically significant. In our study the time taken to insert the device, for Baska mask it was 18.9+4.1 seconds and for the I gel it was 17.2±5.1 seconds with a P value of 0.089 which was statistically insignificant. In our study there was no statistical difference between Baska mask and I-gel groups in regards to hemodynamic changes (Heart rate and Mean arterial pressure). This may be due to the same stress response produced by the both devices. Conclusion: Baska mask is superior to I-gel in positive pressure ventilation under general anaesthesia for short surgical procedures with statistically significant higher airway sealing pressure though it has comparable time of insertion, haemodynamic changes and laryngopharyngeal morbidity.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.