A propensity-score-matched comparison of standard and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy.

Abstract

To compare the difference in perioperative outcomes between standard pelvic lymph node dissection (sPLND) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and evaluate the survival outcomes. The clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent RARC between January 2016 and December 2020 in Nanjing Drum Hospital. The patients were divided into sPLND and ePLND group according to the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection. Finally, 80 pairs of patients obtained for two groups by propensity score matching (PSM) and their perioperative and survival outcomes were analyzed. The median number of dissected lymph nodes (LN) after PSM was 13 in sPLND group and 16 in ePLND group (P = 0.004). Perioperative complications were similar between 2 groups. After PSM, ePLND improved 5-year RFS and OS in all patients (85.74 vs. 61.94%, P = 0.004; 82.80 vs. 67.50%, P = 0.033), patients with ≥ T3 disease (73.66 vs. 23.86%; P = 0.007; 68.20 vs. 36.20%; P = 0.032) and patients with LN metastasis (67.70 vs. 7.33%; P = 0.004; 60.60 vs. 16.67%; P = 0.045) compared to sPLND. Extended PLND significantly increased lymph node yield without increasing complication and improved RFS and OS compared to sPLND.