Abstract

It is often said that Brouwer's fixed point theorem cannot be constructively proved. On the other hand, Sperner's lemma, which is used to prove Brouwer's theorem, can be constructively proved. Some authors have presented a constructive (or an approximate) version of Brouwer's fixed point theorem using Sperner's lemma. They, however, assume uniform continuity of functions. We consider uniform sequential continuity of functions. In classical mathematics, uniform continuity and uniform sequential continuity are equivalent. In constructive mathematics a la Bishop, however, uniform sequential continuity is weaker than uniform continuity. We will prove a constructive version of Brouwer's fixed point theorem in an n-dimensional simplex for uniformly sequentially continuous functions. We follow the Bishop style constructive mathematics.

Highlights

  • IntroductionReference 1 provided a constructive proof of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem

  • It is often said that Brouwer’s fixed point theorem cannot be constructively proved

  • The existence of an exact fixed point of a function which satisfies some property of local non-constancy may be constructively proved

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reference 1 provided a constructive proof of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem. Brouwer’s fixed point theorem can be constructively, in the sense of constructive mathematics a la Bishop, proved only approximately. Some authors have presented a constructive or an approximate version of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem using Sperner’s lemma. We consider uniform sequential continuity of ISRN Applied Mathematics functions according to 5. In classical mathematics uniform continuity and uniform sequential continuity are equivalent. In constructive mathematics a la Bishop, uniform sequential continuity is weaker than uniform continuity. We will prove a constructive version of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem in an n-dimensional simplex for uniformly sequentially continuous functions. We follow the Bishop style constructive mathematics according to 2, 8, 9

Sperner’s Lemma
Since n j
Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call