Abstract
Long-term synaptic plasticity is widely believed to underlie learning and memory in the brain. Whether plasticity is primarily expressed pre- or postsynaptically has been the subject of considerable debate for many decades. More recently, it is generally agreed that the locus of plasticity depends on a number of factors, such as developmental stage, induction protocol, and synapse type. Since presynaptic expression alters not just the gain but also the short-term dynamics of a synapse, whereas postsynaptic expression only modifies the gain, the locus has fundamental implications for circuits dynamics and computations in the brain. It therefore remains crucial for our understanding of neuronal circuits to know the locus of expression of long-term plasticity. One classical method for elucidating whether plasticity is pre- or postsynaptically expressed is based on analysis of the coefficient of variation (CV), which serves as a measure of noise levels of synaptic neurotransmission. Here, we provide a practical guide to using CV analysis for the purposes of exploring the locus of expression of long-term plasticity, primarily aimed at beginners in the field. We provide relatively simple intuitive background to an otherwise theoretically complex approach as well as simple mathematical derivations for key parametric relationships. We list important pitfalls of the method, accompanied by accessible computer simulations to better illustrate the problems (downloadable from GitHub), and we provide straightforward solutions for these issues.
Highlights
Synapses transform and transmit information between neurons in a dynamic manner
A Guide to coefficient of variation (CV) Analysis properties—or postsynaptically—through modifications to the number and/or responsiveness of postsynaptic receptors (Lisman, 2003; MacDougall and Fine, 2014; Padamsey and Emptage, 2014). Much of this earlier divisiveness stemmed from the difficulty in analyzing central synapses (Bliss, 1990; Redman, 1990; Korn and Faber, 1991) using classical methods that were developed in the context of the neuromuscular junction (Del Castillo and Katz, 1954)
Coefficient of variation analysis compares the relative change of synaptic parameters before and after induction of plasticity (Faber and Korn, 1991), which in practical terms means we work with normalized values of CV and mean synaptic strength, μ
Summary
Synapses transform and transmit information between neurons in a dynamic manner. This activity-dependent capacity to modify the strength of connections between neurons—termed synaptic plasticity—is widely believed to underlie information storage (Bliss and Collingridge, 1993; Malenka and Bear, 2004; Nabavi et al, 2014) as well as circuit remapping during development (Katz and Shatz, 1996; Cline, 1998; Song and Abbott, 2001). When the binomial model is relied upon, it is for example implicitly assumed that the release probability, p, and quantal size, q, are uniform across all n release sites (Box 1) These assumptions have the added benefit of simplifying the relationships between the synaptic parameters n, p, and q (McLachlan, 1978; Redman, 1990; Faber and Korn, 1991; Korn and Faber, 1991; Costa et al, 2017). Since CV analysis relies on a finite number of data points in the baseline and post-induction period, the slope of the line between the coordinate (1, 1) and the end point will suffer from inaccuracy, due to the noise inherent in the stochasticity of release This means pre- and postsynaptically expressed plasticity will not always give rise to data points on opposite sides of the diagonal demarcation line (e.g., see Figures 4 and 5), especially for experiments with baseline period with relatively few responses. We find that subtracting the background noise has little or no impact on the locus of expression, as long as the background noise is stable across recordings
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have