Abstract
This paper would provide the analyst with an easy to use step-by-step guide to calculate the uncertainty of measurement in implementing a new analytical method. There are two main ways to attain such an achievement. The first is to consider all the possible sources of variability and then to sum up all of them in the final calculation. The second is taking part in a collaborative trial and processing the resulting statistics. Both methods imply different advantages and drawbacks. It is up the analyst to choose the one fits best his requirements. Anyway it is nearly inescapable providing, along with the test result, its own uncertainty. This entire subject is stated by a standard well known to those who practise the profession of a chemical analyst, which is the UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005. This standard has been imposed by the European Community for matters concerning food and environmental surveillance, but it has also become part of the guidelines of several National Associations of Clinical Toxicology. This standard pledges the analyst to use validated analytical methods, issued by one of the national or international Standards Organizations or, at least, by an internationally acknowledged Scientific Society.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.