Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) has been massively deployed worldwide and has become a major environmental pressure for biodiversity, especially contributing to habitat loss and landscape fragmentation. To mitigate these latter, green and blue infrastructure policies have been developed throughout the world based on the concept of ecological networks, a set of suitable interconnected habitats. However, currently, these nature conservation policies hardly consider the adverse effects of ALAN. Here, we promote the integration of darkness quality within the 'green and blue infrastructure', to implement a ‘dark infrastructure’. Dark infrastructure should be identified, preserved and restored at different territorial levels to guarantee ecological continuities where the night and its rhythms are as natural as possible. For this purpose, we propose an operational 4-steps process that includes 1) Mapping of light pollution in all its forms and dimensions in relation to biodiversity, 2) Identifying the dark infrastructure starting or not from the already identified green/blue infrastructure, 3) Planning actions to preserve and restore the dark infrastructure by prioritizing lighting sobriety and not only energy saving, 4) Assessing the effectiveness of the dark infrastructure with appropriate indicators. Dark infrastructure projects have already been created (for example in France and Switzerland) and can serve as case studies for both urban and natural areas. The deployment of dark infrastructure raises many operational and methodological questions and stresses some knowledge gaps that still need to be addressed, such as the exhaustive mapping of light pollution and the characterization of sensitivity thresholds for model species.

Highlights

  • Artificial light at night (ALAN) has been massively deployed worldwide and has become a major environmental pressure for biodiversity, especially contributing to habitat loss and landscape fragmentation

  • These nature conservation policies hardly consider the adverse effects of artificial light at night (ALAN)

  • We promote the integration of darkness quality within the ’green and blue infrastructure’, to implement a ‘dark infrastructure’

Read more

Summary

An emergency for nocturnal biodiversity on Earth

In only a few decades, light pollution, i.e. the emission of artificial light at night (ALAN) has become recognized as a worldwide phenom­ enon (Bennie et al, 2015; Falchi et al, 2016). As a clue for this, recent results of a monitoring study on the impact of ALAN on nocturnal moth populations indicated that some demographic effects can be identified after a 3-years duration (van Grunsven et al, 2020). This type of example is becoming more and more common in the existing literature

The plethorous and detrimental effects of ALAN on living organisms
ALAN leads to habitat loss and fragmentation
Current ecological network policies: green and blue infrastructure
Incorporating natural light levels
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 4
First successful ‘dark infrastructure’ projects
Research and development issues
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.