Abstract

Recent high-throughput sequencing endeavors have yielded multigene/protein phylogenies that confidently resolve several inter- and intra-class relationships within the phylum Ciliophora. We leverage the massive sequencing efforts from the Marine Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome Sequencing Project, other SRA submissions, and available genome data with our own sequencing efforts to determine the phylogenetic position of Mesodinium and to generate the most taxonomically rich phylogenomic ciliate tree to date. Regardless of the data mining strategy, the multiprotein data set, or the molecular models of evolution employed, we consistently recovered the same well-supported relationships among ciliate classes, confirming many of the higher-level relationships previously identified. Mesodinium always formed a monophyletic group with members of the Litostomatea, with mixotrophic species of Mesodinium—M. rubrum, M. major, and M. chamaeleon—being more closely related to each other than to the heterotrophic member, M. pulex. The well-supported position of Mesodinium as sister to other litostomes contrasts with previous molecular analyses including those from phylogenomic studies that exploited the same transcriptomic databases. These topological discrepancies illustrate the need for caution when mining mixed-species transcriptomes and indicate that identifying ciliate sequences among prey contamination—particularly for Mesodinium species where expression from stolen prey nuclei appears to dominate—requires thorough and iterative vetting with phylogenies that incorporate sequences from a large outgroup of prey.

Highlights

  • IntroductionMesodinium represents a phylogenetically problematic taxon subject to long-branch attraction (LBA) artifacts in SSU and LSU rDNA gene trees and inconsistent placement in phylogenomic analyses (Johnson et al 2004; Struder-Kypke et al 2006; Vd’acny et al 2011; Chen, Ma, et al 2015; Chen, Zhao, et al 2015; Gao et al 2016; Lynn and Kolisko 2017; Lynn et al 2018)

  • Representative SSU rDNA sequences for Mesodinium rubrum and Mesodinium pulex share three molecular synapomorphies common to all ciliates of the class Litostomatea, they have additional insertions, deletions, and substitutions not shared by other ciliates (Johnson et al 2004; Struder-Kypke et al 2006; Bass et al 2009; Herfort et al 2011)

  • We evaluated the position of Protocruzia adherens and the relationships of mixotrophic Mesodinium species, the only variably situated branches among all trees generated from Strategies 1 and 2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mesodinium represents a phylogenetically problematic taxon subject to long-branch attraction (LBA) artifacts in SSU and LSU rDNA gene trees and inconsistent placement in phylogenomic analyses (Johnson et al 2004; Struder-Kypke et al 2006; Vd’acny et al 2011; Chen, Ma, et al 2015; Chen, Zhao, et al 2015; Gao et al 2016; Lynn and Kolisko 2017; Lynn et al 2018).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call