Abstract

The segmentation of Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images is vital and fundamental in SAR image processing, so evaluating segmentation results without ground truth (GT) is an essential part in segmentation algorithms comparison, parameters selection, and optimization. In this study, we first extracted the heterogeneous features (HF) of SAR images to adequately describe the SAR image targets, which were extracted by the proposed intensity feature extractor (IFEE) based on edge-hold and two fruitful methods. Then we proposed a novel and effective unsupervised evaluation (UE) metric <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">G</i> to evaluate the SAR image segmentation results, which metric based on HF using the global intra-segment homogeneity ( <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">GHO</i> ), global inter-segment heterogeneity ( <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">GHE</i> ), and edge validity index ( <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">EVI</i> ) as local segmentation measures. The effectiveness of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">GHO</i> , <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">GHE</i> , <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">EVI,</i> and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">G</i> was revealed by visual interpretation as qualitative analysis and supervised evaluation (SE) as quantitative analysis. In experiments, four segmentation algorithms are used to segment plenty of synthetic and real SAR images as the evaluation objects, and four widely used metrics are utilized for comparison. The results show the effectiveness, and superiority of the proposed metric. Moreover, the mean correlation between the proposed UE metric and the SE metric is more than 0.67 and 0.99, which indicates that the proposed metric helps in choosing parameters of segmentation algorithms without GT.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.