Abstract

Enhancers are short genomic regions exerting tissue-specific regulatory roles, usually for remote coding regions. Enhancers are observed in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes, and their detections facilitate a better understanding of the transcriptional regulation mechanism. The accurate detection and transcriptional regulation strength evaluation of the enhancers remain a major bioinformatics challenge. Most of the current studies utilized the statistical features of short fixed-length nucleotide sequences. This study introduces the location information of each k-mer (SeqPose) into the encoding strategy of a DNA sequence and employs the attention mechanism in the two-layer bi-directional long-short term memory (BD-LSTM) model (spEnhancer) for the enhancer detection problem. The first layer of the delivered classifier discriminates between enhancers and non-enhancers, and the second layer evaluates the transcriptional regulation strength of the detected enhancer. The SeqPose-encoded features are selected by the Chi-squared test, and 45 positions are removed from further analysis. The existing studies may focus on selecting the statistical DNA sequence descriptors with large contributions to the prediction models. This study does not utilize these statistical DNA sequence descriptors. Then the word vector of the SeqPose-encoded features is obtained by using the word embedding layer. This study hypothesizes that different word vector features may contribute differently to the enhancer detection model, and assigns different weights to these word vectors through the attention mechanism in the BD-LSTM model. The previous study generously provided the training and independent test datasets, and the proposed spEnhancer is compared with the three existing state-of-the-art studies using the same experimental procedure. The leave-one-out validation data on the training dataset shows that the proposed spEnhancer achieves similar detection performances as the three existing studies. While spEnhancer achieves the best overall performance metric MCC for both of the two binary classification problems on the independent test dataset. The experimental data shows that the strategy of removing redundant positions (SeqPose) may help improve the DNA sequence-based prediction models. spEnhancer may serve well as a complementary model to the existing studies, especially for the novel query enhancers that are not included in the training dataset.

Highlights

  • The innovative technologies and comprehensive biological investigations show that the non-coding genomic regions are not functionally inactive as previously hypothesized and play essential roles in transcriptional regulations [1]

  • In the first three subsections, we divide 10% of the 2968 training DNA sequences into test sets, 10% of the remaining data sets into verification sets, and the rest were all used as training sets for training models

  • It is anticipated that different length of k-mers makes different sequence preprocessing strategy (SeqPose) features and may have large impacts on the final prediction models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The innovative technologies and comprehensive biological investigations show that the non-coding genomic regions are not functionally inactive as previously hypothesized and play essential roles in transcriptional regulations [1]. An enhancer is a small genomic region that binds to transcription factors and exerts its regulatory roles to the target genes [2,3]. The burst frequency of a target gene may be significantly increased by enhancers [5]. The functional investigation of enhancers will improve our understanding of the transcription regulation mechanism [6]. Enhancers may be detected through in vivo animal experiments. Heintzman and Ren identified novel enhancers through the binding affinities to the transcription factors like P300 [7]. Boyle et al detected enhancers by investigating the DNaseI hypersensitivity [8]. The wet-lab experiments are time-consuming and labor-intensive, and many enhancers cannot be detected in this way due to their condition-specific activities [9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call