Abstract

Airborne laser scanner (ALS) data provide an enhanced capability to remotely map two key variables in forestry: leaf area index (LAI) and tree height (H). Nevertheless, the cost, complexity and accessibility of this technology are not yet suited for meeting the broad demands required for estimating and frequently updating forest data. Here we demonstrate the capability of alternative solutions based on the use of low-cost color infrared (CIR) cameras to estimate tree-level parameters, providing a cost-effective solution for forest inventories. ALS data were acquired with a Leica ALS60 laser scanner and digital aerial imagery (DAI) was acquired with a consumer-grade camera modified for color infrared detection and synchronized with a GPS unit. In this paper we evaluate the generation of a DAI-based canopy height model (CHM) from imagery obtained with low-cost CIR cameras using structure from motion (SfM) and spatial interpolation methods in the context of a complex canopy, as in forestry. Metrics were calculated from the DAI-based CHM and the DAI-based Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for the estimation of tree height and LAI, respectively. Results were compared with the models estimated from ALS point cloud metrics. Field measurements of tree height and effective leaf area index (LAIe) were acquired from a total of 200 and 26 trees, respectively. Comparable accuracies were obtained in the tree height and LAI estimations using ALS and DAI data independently. Tree height estimated from DAI-based metrics (Percentile 90 (P90) and minimum height (MinH)) yielded a coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.71 and a root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.71 m while models derived from ALS-based metrics (P90) yielded an R2 = 0.80 and an RMSE = 0.55 m. The estimation of LAI from DAI-based NDVI using Percentile 99 (P99) yielded an R2 = 0.62 and an RMSE = 0.17 m2/m−2. A comparative analysis of LAI estimation using ALS-based metrics (laser penetration index (LPI), interquartile distance (IQ), and Percentile 30 (P30)) yielded an R2 = 0.75 and an RMSE = 0.14 m2/m−2. The results provide insight on the appropriateness of using cost-effective 3D photo-reconstruction methods for targeting single trees with irregular and heterogeneous tree crowns in complex open-canopy forests. It quantitatively demonstrates that low-cost CIR cameras can be used to estimate both single-tree height and LAI in forest inventories.

Highlights

  • Remote sensing of forest biophysical variables is currently a matter of growing interest for forest yield assessment, bio-energy production, and the study of the global carbon cycle

  • Based on the analysis described above, simple linear and multiple regression models were applied to evaluate the accuracy of digital aerial imagery (DAI)- and Airborne laser scanner (ALS)-based metrics separately in retrieving in situ tree height

  • These results suggest that Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) metrics derived from DAI obtained with a consumer-grade camera are a useful indicator of leaf area index (LAIe) in the type of forest canopy explored

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Remote sensing of forest biophysical variables is currently a matter of growing interest for forest yield assessment, bio-energy production, and the study of the global carbon cycle. Canopy height are key variables when the goal is to model ecosystem productivity by characterizing the structure and the functioning of vegetation. Leaf area index, defined as the ratio of leaf area (m2) per ground area (m−2), is one of the most important biophysical variables for modeling vegetation functioning and biomass production. Accurate and efficient LAI mapping methodologies based on remote sensing data are required to avoid having to use expensive in situ techniques in forest areas. Optical remote sensing of LAI relies on spectral sensitivity to changes in vegetative components in the visible and near-infrared wavelengths. Such changes have mainly been analyzed using the Normalized

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call