Abstract
AbstractPartnering behavior is central to understanding fertility. Influential concepts, including singlehood, serial monogamy, and multiple‐partner fertility, are frequently used to analyze partnering and childbearing dynamics. These concepts are evoked to understand individual and population‐level patterns but are mainly analyzed at the individual level. We propose a measure for gauging the interplay between partnerships and childbearing at the population level, namely cohort fertility rates (CFR) as the sum of births under various partnership contexts. Surprisingly, demographers rarely measure and do not have a clear picture of the extent to which childbearing in different partnership contexts contributes to completed fertility. We analyze Finnish register data to decompose CFR into births across union status, union order, and reproductive partner order. Contrary to the discourse of partnering in the Nordics, births within first unions to first reproductive partners account for about two‐thirds of CFR. Births in higher‐order unions to first reproductive partners account for one‐fifth. Single births and births with higher‐order reproductive partners have a modest impact. This ranking holds across sex and educational level. We argue that the proposed measures offer a novel appraisal of population‐level implications of partnerships and childbearing dynamics and provide an opportunity to understand cross‐country variation in fertility patterns.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Cohort Fertility Rates
Reproductive Partners
Partnership Contexts
Serial Monogamy
Union Status
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Migracijske i etničke teme / Migration and Ethnic Themes
Jan 1, 2022
European Journal of Population
Aug 10, 2020
Sep 1, 2019
European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie
Mar 1, 2021
Curriculum Development Journal
Dec 4, 2020
Population and Development Review
Dec 7, 2016
Frontiers in Public Health
Jul 6, 2022
Population Research and Policy Review
Mar 2, 2023
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Aug 1, 2015
Journal of Hypertension
Oct 1, 2018
PeerJ
Sep 28, 2017
Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics
Sep 1, 2011
Sep 5, 2021
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
Mar 1, 2022
Environmental Pollution
Mar 1, 2022
Population and Development Review
Population and Development Review
Nov 20, 2023
Population and Development Review
Nov 13, 2023
Population and Development Review
Nov 10, 2023
Population and Development Review
Oct 12, 2023
Population and Development Review
Oct 12, 2023
Population and Development Review
Oct 3, 2023
Population and Development Review
Oct 2, 2023
Population and Development Review
Aug 22, 2023
Population and Development Review
Aug 22, 2023
Population and Development Review
Aug 17, 2023