Abstract
Abstract The E-LISA research project, under way within the Clean Sky 2 framework has the objective of developing an innovative iron bird to qualification and performance tests for the landing gear of an executive aircraft with a fully electrical landing gear system, thus with electro-mechanical landing gear actuators and electrical brake. The proposed test rig consists of a multi-functional intelligent test facility with the objective to perform all the tests and analyses required to assess the maturity of an electro-mechanical landing gear and demonstrate the feasibility of Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) functionalities for the electrical brake system. One of the most critical elements in the design of such iron-bird is the definition of the system replicating the aircraft inertia, which presence is necessary to properly assess the behavior of both the brake and its anti-skid logic during landing. The most common solution foresees to bring the landing gear leg in contact against a rotating cylinder, or runway simulator, which moment of inertia is equivalent to the aircraft mass. Although it is possible to reduce the system encumbrance through the introduction of a geared reducer, such architecture is usually extremely heavy and requires significant space in the test facilities. This architecture is also difficult to adapt to different aircrafts, since it would require the addition or replacement of these heavy flywheels, which is both difficult and dangerous. This paper deals with the definition of a possible alternative, based on a hydraulic solution, where two variable-displacement hydraulic motors, connected to a light rotating cylinder, are used to replicate most of the aircraft inertial forces during braking. The paper opens with the preliminary sizing of such system, presents the high-fidelity simulation environment used to assess its expected performances and compare the behavior of the hydraulic solution with that of the traditional configuration, finally presenting both the benefits and the disadvantages of the proposed architecture.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.