Abstract

Based on the operator product expansion, the perturbative and nonperturbative contributions to the polarized Bjorken sum rule (BSR) can be separated conveniently, and the nonperturbative one can be fitted via a proper comparison with the experimental data. In the paper, we first give a detailed study on the pQCD corrections to the leading-twist part of BSR. Basing on the accurate pQCD prediction of BSR, we then give a novel fit of the non-perturbative high-twist contributions by comparing with JLab data. Previous pQCD corrections to the leading-twist part derived under conventional scale-setting approach still show strong renormalization scale dependence. The principle of maximum conformality (PMC) provides a systematic and strict way to eliminate conventional renormalization scale-setting ambiguity by determining the accurate alpha _s-running behavior of the process with the help of renormalization group equation. Our calculation confirms the PMC prediction satisfies the standard renormalization group invariance, e.g. its fixed-order prediction does scheme-and-scale independent. In low Q^2-region, the effective momentum of the process is small and in order to derive a reliable prediction, we adopt four low-energy alpha _s models to do the analysis, i.e. the model based on the analytic perturbative theory (APT), the Webber model (WEB), the massive pQCD model (MPT) and the model under continuum QCD theory (CON). Our predictions show that even though the high-twist terms are generally power suppressed in high Q^2-region, they shall have sizable contributions in low and intermediate Q^2 domain. Based on the more accurate scheme-and-scale independent pQCD prediction, our newly fitted results for the high-twist corrections at Q^2=1;mathrm{GeV}^2 are, f_2^{p-n}|_{mathrm{APT}}=-0.120pm 0.013, f_2^{p-n}|_mathrm{WEB}=-0.081pm 0.013, f_2^{p-n}|_{mathrm{MPT}}=-0.128pm 0.013 and f_2^{p-n}|_{mathrm{CON}}=-0.139pm 0.013; mu _6|_mathrm{APT}=0.003pm 0.000, mu _6|_{mathrm{WEB}}=0.001pm 0.000, mu _6|_mathrm{MPT}=0.003pm 0.000 and mu _6|_{mathrm{CON}}=0.002pm 0.000, respectively, where the errors are squared averages of those from the statistical and systematic errors from the measured data.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe Bjorken sum rule (BSR) [1,2], which describes the polarized spin structure of nucleon, has been measured via polarized deep inelastic scattering (DIS) by various experimental collaborations [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]

  • The fourth low-energy model is based on the continuum theory [86] and we call it as the continuum QCD theory (CON) model, where the exchanging gluons with effective dynamical mass mg is adopted and the non-perturbative dynamics of gluons is governed by the corresponding Schwinger–Dyson equation

  • In the following discussions, we use αsMS to stand for the case of using MS-scheme αs in all Q2-region, αsAPT to stand for the case of using analytic perturbative theory (APT) model in low-energy region (Q < Q0, as mentioned above, Q0 is different for different low-energy model) and MS-scheme αs in large Q2-region, αsWEB to stand for the case of using Webber model (WEB) model in low-energy model and MSscheme αs in large Q2-region, αsMPT to stand for the case of using massive analytic pQCD theory” (MPT) model in low-energy model and MS-scheme αs in large Q2-region, and αsCON to stand for the case of using CON model in low-energy model and MS-scheme αs in large Q2-region

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Bjorken sum rule (BSR) [1,2], which describes the polarized spin structure of nucleon, has been measured via polarized deep inelastic scattering (DIS) by various experimental collaborations [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Such guessing choice breaks the renormalization group invariance [43,44] and leads to conventional renormalization scale-and-scheme ambiguities due to the mismatching of the perturbative coefficients and the αs at each order. We shall first adopt the PMC single-scale approach [52] to deal with the perturbative part of the BSR, and give a new determination of the non-perturbative high-twist contributions by comparing with the JLab data. Though different from conventional scale ambiguity, there is residual scale dependence for fixed-order prediction due to unknown perturbative terms [54]. Such residual scale dependence can be greatly suppressed due to both αs-power suppression and exponential suppression.

Calculation technology
Perturbative series of the leading-twist terms
Contributions from the non-perturbative high-twist terms
The strong coupling constant αs
Perturbative contributions to the leading-twist part of BSR up to N4LO level
Analysis of high-twist contributions under various low-energy models
An analysis of high-twist contributions with massive high-twist expression
Summary

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.