Abstract

Coordinated Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is a significant improvement of TOPSIS, which take into account the coordination level of attributes in the decision-making or assessment. However, in this study, it is found that the existing coordinated TOPSIS has some limitations and problems, which are listed as follows. (1) It is based on modified TOPSIS, not the original TOPSIS. (2) It is inapplicable when using vector normalization. (3) The calculation formulas of the coordination degree are incorrect. (4) The coordination level of attributes is interrelated with the weights. In this paper, the problems of the existing coordinated TOPSIS are explained and revised, and a novel coordinated TOPSIS based on coefficient of variation is proposed to avoid the limitations. Comparisons of the existing, revised, and proposed coordinated TOPSIS are carried out based on two case studies. The comparison results validate the feasibility of the proposed coordinated TOPSIS.

Highlights

  • The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is a classical multi-attribute decision-making method, which was first put forward by Hwang and Yoon in 1981 [1].This method attempts to rank the alternatives by calculating their distances from the ideal solution (IS)and the negative ideal solution (NIS) and selects the optimum one that should simultaneously have the shortest distance from the IS and the farthest distance from the NIS

  • Considering that TOPSIS lacks evaluation from the perspective of attribute coordination, Yu et al (2018) proposed coordinated TOPSIS, which takes into account the coordination level of attributes [16]

  • (1) CM-TOPSIS is not based on the original TOPSIS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is a classical multi-attribute decision-making method, which was first put forward by Hwang and Yoon in 1981 [1].This method attempts to rank the alternatives by calculating their distances from the ideal solution (IS)and the negative ideal solution (NIS) and selects the optimum one that should simultaneously have the shortest distance from the IS and the farthest distance from the NIS. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is a classical multi-attribute decision-making method, which was first put forward by Hwang and Yoon in 1981 [1]. This method attempts to rank the alternatives by calculating their distances from the ideal solution (IS). When alternatives are described by statistically connected criteria, the application of TOPSIS may cause improper ranking results [13] To avoid this problem, Antuchevičienė et al (2010) suggested using the Mahalanobis distance instead of Euclidean distance for TOPSIS [13]. Yang and Wu (2019) pointed out that TOPSIS does not consider the data distribution of the degree of dispersion and aggregation when it is compared with the IS and the NIS and proposed a novel TOPSIS based on improved grey relational analysis [14]

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call